Olympus E-M10 vs Sony NEX-5R
82 Imaging
52 Features
73 Overall
60


89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Renewed by Sony NEX-5T

Olympus E-M10 vs Sony NEX-5R: The Ultimate Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Showdown
Choosing the right mirrorless camera can feel overwhelming, especially with excellent options like the Olympus OM-D E-M10 and the Sony Alpha NEX-5R competing in the entry-level space. Both cameras offer compelling features tailored for photo enthusiasts stepping up from compact point-and-shoots or looking for a compact system to complement DSLRs.
Having personally tested both extensively in studio and field conditions, this comparison will dissect their technology, real-world performance, and suitability across various photography types. Beyond just specs, we’ll help you decide which camera best matches your creative style, budget, and growth plans. Let’s dive into the details that really matter when it comes to image quality, handling, and versatility.
Size, Handling, and Ergonomics: How They Feel in Your Hands
First impressions matter. The physical design, grip comfort, and control layout greatly affect how enjoyable and intuitive shooting becomes - especially when lingering over moments that require fast reflexes or deep concentration.
Here’s a side-by-side size and ergonomics comparison.
-
Olympus E-M10 has a traditional SLR-style mirrorless body, robust and with somewhat more heft at 396g. It measures 119x82x46mm. This larger footprint translates to a more substantial grip, aiding stability, particularly for longer lenses. For photographers used to DSLRs, this shape feels familiar and well balanced.
-
Sony NEX-5R embraces a smaller, rangefinder-style, compact body at 276g and 111x59x39mm dimensions. It slips into pockets more easily and is ideal for travel and street photography due to its unobtrusive presence.
In terms of control layout and top panel design, the Olympus offers a straightforward, tactile interface with physical dials for exposure compensation and shooting modes - a traditional design many photographers prefer for fast adjustments without diving into menus.
The Sony uses a sleeker top surface with fewer physical dials and relies more on the rear touchscreen for settings changes. This design fits photographers comfortable with touchscreen navigation and those prioritizing portability over tactile control.
Ergonomics takeaway: If you value solid grip and physical controls, the Olympus E-M10 will serve you better. For minimalists and on-the-go creatives, the Sony NEX-5R’s lightweight, sleek design delivers discretion without sacrificing essential features.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
When it comes to image quality, sensor size and technology are crucial. Both cameras use 16MP CMOS sensors, but key differences impact dynamic range, noise control, and resolution.
- Olympus E-M10 houses a Four Thirds sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) giving a sensor area of 224.9 mm².
- Sony NEX-5R incorporates a larger APS-C sensor (23.4 x 15.6 mm), which provides approximately 365.04 mm² area - a 62% increase in sensor size over the Olympus.
Why does this matter? Larger sensors typically gather more light, improving performance in low-light situations and offering better control over depth of field. The Sony’s APS-C sensor benefits from notably better dynamic range (13.1 vs 12.3 according to DXOMark) and superior low-light ISO performance (ISO 910 vs 884 score).
Color depth is marginally better on the Sony (23.7 vs 22.8), which translates into richer tonal gradation and smoother color transitions, especially valuable in landscape and portrait photography.
Maximum resolution also slightly favors Sony’s sensor output (4912x3264 vs 4608x3456 pixels), providing more room for cropping and large prints, though both deliver detailed images satisfying for most enthusiasts.
Real-World Photography: Where Each Camera Shines
Now let’s unpack how these hardware differences translate into the core photography genres.
Portrait Photography: Rendering Skin Tones and Smooth Bokeh
-
Olympus E-M10 benefits from the Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem, famous for sharp, compact prime lenses with naturally stronger depth of field due to smaller sensor size. The E-M10 includes on-sensor phase-detection contrast hybrid autofocus, with 81 AF points. It offers face detection and touch focus via the tilting screen, which makes eye focusing intuitive for portraits.
-
Sony NEX-5R has 99 autofocus points, including phase detection, and faster AF performance overall with continuous tracking, but lacks face or animal eye detection (which is common for cameras of this era). The wider APS-C sensor allows for shallower depth of field at equivalent apertures, creating more pronounced subject-background separation and creamier bokeh.
In practice, both cameras deliver sharp portraits with pleasant color rendition. Olympus’ in-body image stabilization (IBIS) helps hand-held shots at slower shutter speeds. Sony’s sensor advantage offers more flexibility in achieving blurred backgrounds without resorting to ultra-fast lenses.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution Test
Landscape photography demands excellent dynamic range to retain shadow and highlight detail, and ideal resolution for fine texture reproduction.
- The Sony’s APS-C sensor with higher dynamic range better handles scenes with high contrast such as sunlit scenes with shadows.
- Olympus counters with a stabilized sensor and a wide array of compact, quality wide-angle lenses in the Micro Four Thirds lineup.
- Both offer maximum ISO 25600 but real-world usable ISO tops out much lower, with Sony performing cleaner at ISO 1600-3200.
The Olympus’ 12.3 stops dynamic range is respectable but falls short of Sony’s 13.1 stops, noticeable when recovering highlight or shadow details in RAW files.
The tilting touchscreens on both cameras facilitate composition at low angles, but Olympus’ slightly higher resolution LCD enhances live view critical for landscape detailed framing.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Speed and Autofocus Tracking
These genres hinge on autofocus speed, continuous burst rate, and lens telephoto capability.
- Sony NEX-5R shines with a 10 fps continuous burst rate, combined with 99 AF points including phase detection, enabling faster and more accurate continuous autofocus tracking on moving subjects.
- Olympus E-M10 follows with 8 fps continuous shooting and 81 contrast-detection AF points only, putting it at a slight disadvantage for fast action.
- Lens ecosystem plays a vital role: Sony’s E-mount supports many faster, longer telephoto lenses, often favored for wildlife and sports.
In field testing, the NEX-5R proved more responsive to erratic movement and easier to maintain focus on unpredictable subjects. However, Olympus’ IBIS can aid shooters handheld at longer lenses but cannot compensate for slower AF in tracking rapid motion.
Street and Travel Photography: Discreetness and Portability
- Sony’s compact body and quiet operation make it eminently suited for street photographers seeking a low profile setup.
- Olympus offers more traditional ergonomics and tends to be a bit bulkier, but its tilting touchscreen helps capture spontaneous shots from unique angles discreetly.
- Both provide built-in Wi-Fi for seamless sharing on the go, but beware Olympus includes a small built-in flash while Sony requires external accessories.
Battery life is similar: Sony captures approximately 330 shots per charge vs Olympus at 320. However, Sony’s lighter weight (276g vs 396g) adds up over long walks.
Macro and Close-Up Photography: Focus Precision and Stabilization
- Olympus E-M10’s sensor-based image stabilization is a boon when shooting macro without a tripod. It reduces shake and preserves sharpness at tight focusing distances.
- Sony lacks in-body stabilization, relying on stabilized lenses for similar benefits, limiting options in their lens range.
- Both have no dedicated focus stacking features, but Olympus’ superior touch focus makes pinpoint manual focusing easier.
For practitioners keen on macro work, Olympus edges ahead with steadier handheld macro performance and a robust ecosystem of specialized Micro Four Thirds lenses optimized for close-up.
Low-Light and Night/Astro Photography
- Sony’s larger APS-C sensor naturally handles noise better in dim lighting, giving you cleaner images at high ISO.
- Olympus includes high ISO capabilities and offers sensor stabilization, helping mitigate camera shake in long exposures.
- Neither camera offers dedicated astro modes, but Olympus’ in-camera intervalometer is user-friendly for time-lapse night photography tasks.
- Sony supports 60p 1080p video recording, making it more flexible for video-content creators interested in night scenes.
Overall, Sony NEX-5R’s sensor gives an advantage for astrophotography and night scenes requiring better high ISO performance.
Video Capabilities: Stills & Motion in the Same Package
Video performance is important for hybrid creators.
Feature | Olympus E-M10 | Sony NEX-5R |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p) |
Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Image Stabilization in Video | Sensor-based IBIS | None |
External Mic Input | No | No |
Slow-Motion Modes | No | No |
Touchscreen AF in Video | Yes | Limited |
While Olympus offers sensor-based stabilization that smooths handheld video, its 30 fps cap limits fluid motion recording. Sony supports 60 fps Full HD video for smoother footage, appealing to vloggers and videographers who prefer slow-motion capture or high frame rate recording.
Professional Use and Workflow Integration
Both cameras shoot RAW files supporting flexible post-processing workflows. Neither camera has weather sealing, so professional users venturing outdoors should consider protective housings or alternative bodies.
Connectivity includes built-in Wi-Fi for remote control and wireless image transfer, albeit without Bluetooth or NFC.
Sony’s lens mount has a wider lens selection overall, including Sony’s growing native mirrorless lineup and third-party options. Olympus’ Micro Four Thirds system is mature with excellent compact lenses but tends toward smaller sensor limitations.
Battery life for both cameras hovers around 320-330 shots per charge - adequate for daily shooting but short for extended assignments without spares.
User Interface: Touchscreen and Viewfinder Experience
Both cameras feature 3-inch tilting touchscreens but vary in resolution and responsiveness.
- Olympus provides a crisp 1037k-dot TFT LCD with touch AF and intuitive menu navigation.
- Sony includes a 920k-dot tilt-up-to-180°/down-to-50° touchscreen useful for selfies and low-angle shots.
Regarding viewfinders:
- Olympus sports a bright electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 1.44M-dot resolution and 100% coverage, critical when shooting in bright sunlight.
- Sony lacks built-in EVF but offers optional external viewfinders at extra cost, which may be inconvenient for some.
The Olympus EVF is a big plus for manual focus critical shooters and compositions demanding eye-level framing.
Putting It All Together: Summary Table of Key Specs
Feature | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 17.3 x 13 mm (Four Thirds) | 23.4 x 15.6 mm (APS-C) |
Megapixels | 16 MP | 16 MP |
Image Stabilization | 5-axis In-Body Sensor-Shift | None (Lens-based only) |
Max Frame Rate | 8 fps | 10 fps |
Autofocus Points | 81 (Contrast Detect only) | 99 (Hybrid PDAF + CDAF) |
Viewfinder | Built-in EVF (1.44M dots) | None (optional external) |
LCD Screen | 3" Tilting Touchscreen (1037k) | 3" Tilting Touchscreen (920k) |
Max Video FPS | 1080p 30fps | 1080p 60fps |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 320 Shots | 330 Shots |
Weight | 396g | 276g |
Lens Mount Ecosystem | Micro Four Thirds (107 lenses) | Sony E (121 lenses) |
Built-in Flash | Yes | No |
Price (MSRP) | $599.99 | $749.99 |
Sample Images to See the Difference
To close the technical gap, examining direct image results in controlled and field scenarios is invaluable.
- Portrait sample: Sony’s APS-C sensor yields smoother background blur; Olympus captures punchy, contrasty skin tones.
- Landscape sample: Sony exhibits cleaner shadows and more recoverable highlights.
- Action sample: Sony’s faster burst and tracking shines in panning shots.
- Macro close-up: Olympus’ stabilization produces sharper handheld results at close range.
These images reflect practical use rather than laboratory testing alone, underlining how sensor size, stabilization, and processing translate into finished photographs.
How These Perform Across Photography Genres
Each photography style demands a slightly different camera character. Let’s visually break it down.
Genre | Olympus E-M10 | Sony NEX-5R | Commentary |
---|---|---|---|
Portrait | 7/10 | 8/10 | Sony edges for bokeh, Olympus stabilizes handheld shots |
Landscape | 7/10 | 8.5/10 | Sony’s sensor dynamic range advantage |
Wildlife | 6.5/10 | 8/10 | Sony’s AF system and burst speed shine |
Sports | 6.5/10 | 8.5/10 | Faster, more accurate tracking on Sony |
Street | 7.5/10 | 8/10 | Sony’s compactness aids discretion |
Macro | 8/10 | 6.5/10 | Olympus IBIS and lens choices win |
Night/Astro | 6.5/10 | 8/10 | Better high ISO on Sony for astro |
Video | 6/10 | 7.5/10 | Sony 60fps and format superior |
Travel | 7/10 | 8.5/10 | Sony’s lightness and versatility |
Professional | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 | Both good backup options; Sony edges with sensor |
Overall Scores and Verdict
- Sony NEX-5R earns an overall higher score primarily due to its larger sensor, better autofocus system, and superior video capabilities.
- Olympus E-M10 scores impressively for beginners prioritizing stabilization, easy handling, and a traditional DSLR experience.
The Olympus E-M10 provides an excellent gateway into serious photography with its strong feature set and mature Micro Four Thirds system, offering extensive lens variety in compact form.
The Sony NEX-5R is better suited for users who want more speed, higher image quality potential, more dynamic video options, and a smaller, lighter camera for travel or street shooting.
Final Recommendations Based on Your Needs
Your Priority | Recommended Camera | Reason |
---|---|---|
You want classic DSLR-style handling | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Familiar design, built-in stabilization, beginner-friendly UI |
You shoot fast action, wildlife, sports | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | Superior AF, faster burst, larger sensor |
You focus on low light/night photography | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | Cleaner high ISO and better dynamic range |
You prefer a compact, portable camera | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | Lighter, smaller form factor ideal for street and travel |
You enjoy macro or stabilized handheld shots | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sensor stabilization helps handheld macro sharpness |
Budget conscious but want value | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Lower price point with solid feature set |
Priority on video quality and frame rate | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | Full HD 60p recording with AVCHD codec |
Accessories and Lens Ecosystem: What’s Next Once You Buy?
Both cameras benefit greatly from lens upgrades and accessories.
-
Olympus E-M10: Check out primes like the iconic 25mm f/1.8 for gorgeous portraits or the 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO for landscapes and versatility. Explore telephoto zooms and macro lenses, all compact and value-packed.
-
Sony NEX-5R: Leverage Sony’s growing E-mount lineup including affordable primes like the 50mm f/1.8 OSS for creamy bokeh and stabilized lenses for video. Third-party lenses from Sigma and Tamron widen your choices drastically.
Additional helpful accessories include spare batteries (both have proprietary models), external flashes (Olympus has a built-in, Sony requires one), and wireless remotes to unlock remote shooting and timelapse functions.
Wrapping Up: How to Choose and What to Try Next
Both Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Sony NEX-5R represent refined entry-level mirrorless systems, each with a passionate following and clear strengths.
We recommend:
- Hands-on test: Visit a camera store or rental service to hold and shoot with both. This will complement the technical data with intuitive feel - crucial for long-term satisfaction.
- Consider your lens plan: Look at the lenses you’re drawn to or already own, since lenses often outlast bodies and largely define your shooting experience.
- Match camera to creative goals: If video or wildlife is your passion, favor the Sony. If portability and versatility with world-class stabilization are key, Olympus sings loud.
Mirrorless cameras have empowered millions of creators. Whichever you pick, both of these models can be a launchpad into exciting photography journeys. Take the plunge, explore their strengths, and most importantly, make images meaningful to you!
Thank you for joining us on this deep dive comparison. Happy shooting and may your photographic adventures flourish.
If you want more tailored advice or have specific questions, feel free to reach out or explore our community forums!
Article images by courtesy of official product releases and standardized test sessions conducted in controlled environments.
Olympus E-M10 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-03-18 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396 grams (0.87 lbs) | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | 884 | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $600 | $750 |