Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VG-145, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 7 months after the VG-145 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS scores versus the VG-145 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus VG-145
| TG-820 iHS | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 7 months |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| VG-145 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Olympus VG-145
| TG-820 iHS | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Olympus VG-145 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the VG-145.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and VG-145 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The picture here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and VG-145.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus VG-145 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-820 iHS should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Olympus VG-145 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 120 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 160 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $500 | $0 |
