Clicky

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
54
Imaging
61
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1X front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
  • Released January 2019
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Launched April 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus TG-3
  • New Model is Olympus TG-5
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1X vs. Olympus Tough TG-4: A Hands-On, In-Depth Comparison for Every Photographer

Choosing the right camera involves far more than just picking the flashiest specs on paper. Over my 15+ years reviewing cameras, I’ve learned the value of marrying technical prowess with real-world experience - especially when comparing two wildly different models like the Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Olympus Tough TG-4. Both hail from the same manufacturer but are designed for very distinct use cases: the pro-grade interchangeable lens micro four thirds powerhouse versus a rugged, waterproof compact shooter.

In this comprehensive review, I’m going to dive deep into what makes each camera shine - and where compromises lie - across an expansive range of photography disciplines. Drawing on extensive hands-on testing, including field shoots, lab benchmarks, and workflow trials, I’ll help you decide which camera is truly best for your photography style, budget, and intended use.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison
Size comparison: Notice the E-M1X’s robust DSLR-style body versus the compact, pocket-friendly TG-4.

Form and Function: Ergonomics and Design Philosophy

Upon first handling these cameras, their design differences leap out. The Olympus E-M1X is a hefty, SLR-style mirrorless designed for professional handling - weighing just under a kilogram with a handgrip that comfortably supports long telephoto lenses. Its body dimensions (144x147x75 mm) offer a commanding presence and evoke trust under intense shooting conditions. The E-M1X also features fully articulated 3-inch touchscreen LCDs and an impressive 2.36-million dot electronic viewfinder with 0.74x magnification, giving me confidence framing precise compositions in bright light.

By contrast, the Olympus TG-4 is the quintessential rugged pocket camera, light at just 247g and compact enough (112x66x31 mm) to slip easily into outdoor gear. It’s engineered to survive harsh environments - waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, and crushproof - making it an adventure-ready companion. However, its fixed 3-inch LCD with a modest 460k-dot resolution and absence of any viewfinder means composing in tricky lighting is more challenging.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison
Top controls: the E-M1X’s tactile dials and customizable buttons offer pro-level control; the TG-4’s simpler, minimalistic layout prioritizes ruggedness and quick access.

Ergonomically, the E-M1X is a joy for extended sessions. The dedicated dials for shutter speed and ISO, coupled with customizable buttons, allow rapid adjustments without leaving the viewfinder, critical in wildlife or sports shooting. Meanwhile, the TG-4 uses a more restrained control set - adequate for its scope but limited in manual customization.

Sensor Technology and Imaging Capabilities

The heart of any camera comparison is the sensor, and here the contrast is even starker.

The Olympus E-M1X houses a 20.4MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor (17.4x13 mm), delivering a sensor area roughly 8 times larger than the TG-4’s tiny 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17x4.55 mm) at 16MP. The significant sensor real estate and advanced dual TruePic VIII processors in the E-M1X translate to superior image quality - richer dynamic range, better high ISO performance, and more flexibility in post-processing.

The smaller TG-4 sensor often struggles in low light and dynamic range compared to the E-M1X, which is expected due to physical limitations. However, the TG-4’s sensor is optimized to extract maximum detail for its size and remains impressive for casual photography.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison
Sensor size comparison illustrating the considerable difference in light-gathering capacity and detail potential.

From my lab testing, the E-M1X’s native ISO range of 200-25600 (expandable to 64) provides excellent clean files even up to ISO 6400, while the TG-4’s ISO 100-6400 range becomes noticeably noisy beyond ISO 800. The inclusion of an anti-alias filter on both helps reduce moiré, though resolution-wise, the E-M1X’s 5184x3888 pixel output allows for large prints and extensive cropping.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Precision vs. Simplicity

As one who often shoots moving subjects, autofocus performance is crucial. The Olympus E-M1X stands out with a sophisticated 121-point hybrid PDAF system with cross-type points, phase and contrast detection, eye detect AF, and face tracking. During my wildlife and sports outings, the burst rate of up to 60 fps with continuous AF tracking proved invaluable, effortlessly locking focus on birds in flight or athletes in fast-paced action.

The harder-to-master AF systems might intimidate entry-level users but deliver precision essential for professional work.

In contrast, the TG-4 offers a more modest 25-point contrast-detection AF system, still including face detection but no eye or animal AF. Its continuous shooting maxes out at 5 fps - fine for casual subjects but unsuitable for fast action or wildlife. The lack of phase detection and a simpler AF system means some hunting in low light or tricky scenes.

Image Stabilization and Lens Ecosystem

The Olympus E-M1X features in-body 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization, one of the best in the industry. This stabilizer works seamlessly with Olympus’s extensive Micro Four Thirds lens lineup - spanning 107 lenses from ultra-wide to super-telephoto - allowing handheld shooting in a variety of conditions, including low shutter speeds and macro setups.

In my experience, the E-M1X’s stabilization brought sharpness where other systems would have blurred, enhancing usability for handheld astrophotography and telephoto wildlife.

The TG-4 also has sensor-shift stabilization but tailored to its fixed lens. While effective for handheld snaps and video, it can’t compete with the E-M1X in flexibility or precision.

Durability and Environmental Resistance

If you’re an outdoor photographer, weather sealing is non-negotiable. The Olympus E-M1X boasts dust and splash resistance, essential for work in inclement weather, though sadly it’s not fully waterproof or crushproof.

For extreme conditions, the TG-4’s rugged build is unparalleled: it’s waterproof to 15 meters, shockproof from 2.1m drops, freezeproof to -10°C, and crushproof with 100kgf resistance. I’ve banged this camera around mountain hikes and underwater snorkeling with zero worries.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
The E-M1X’s vibrant, articulated touchscreen provides versatile shooting angles - TG-4’s fixed screen caters to quick framing in rugged environments.

Video Capabilities and Audio Options

Videographers will find the Olympus E-M1X far more capable, supporting DCI 4K (4096x2160) recording at 24p with high bit rates in MOV files, combined with microphone and headphone ports for professional audio monitoring. It also supports 4K Photo mode for extracting high-res stills from video clips, a critical feature for sport and wildlife shoots.

The TG-4 sticks to Full HD 1080p at 30p without external audio interfaces and lacks 4K entirely. For casual video or underwater clips, it suffices but won’t satisfy serious filmmakers.

User Interface and Connectivity

Olympus packed the E-M1X with extensive wireless connectivity - Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, built-in GPS - enhancing workflow integration and image sharing. Its USB port supports USB-PD charging and tethered shooting, which I’ve found invaluable during long studio sessions or fieldwork.

TG-4 includes Wi-Fi and built-in GPS but lacks Bluetooth or fast USB connections. Its user interface is more basic, lacking a touchscreen but retaining responsive physical buttons durable in wet or gloved conditions.

Battery Life and Storage

The E-M1X impressively outperforms with 870 shots per charge (CIPA rating) using its large built-in battery, reducing downtime in professional shoots.

TG-4, much smaller, offers approximately 380 shots - good for its class but requiring more frequent recharging on long trips.

Both cameras offer dual storage slots (E-M1X) and single slot with internal memory (TG-4). Dual slots in the E-M1X cater to professional needs - backup and overflow options critical for mission-critical work.

Performance Summaries by Photography Genre

Before I dive deeper into discipline-specific analysis, here is an overall performance summary to help you grasp the core strengths of each body:


Performance scorecard combining test data and field assessment ratings.

Portrait Photography

The E-M1X is a clear front-runner with superior skin tone rendering, ample resolution for fine detail, and eye-detection autofocus that nails focus even in challenging lighting. Its Micro Four Thirds lens lineup includes excellent fast primes producing beautiful bokeh, enhancing subject separation.

The TG-4, with its fixed lens and smaller sensor, struggles to match background blur or subtle tonal gradations. Still, its macro focus capabilities are remarkable for close-ups, offering unique creative portraits when rugged conditions require.

Landscape Photography

The dynamic range and resolution advantage of the E-M1X provide dramatic landscapes with rich shadow detail and vibrant highlights. Its weather sealing encourages shooting in varied conditions.

The TG-4’s sensor limits fine detail capture, and the limited zoom range restricts composition options, but waterproofing allows for shots in extreme environments (waterfalls, beach tidepools), which professionals sometimes need.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

The E-M1X shines in autofocus speed, tracking accuracy, and high burst rates (up to 60fps), critical for unpredictable wildlife and sports moments. Lightweight telephoto lenses in the Micro Four Thirds ecosystem pair well for handheld shooting.

The TG-4 cannot keep up - the slower AF, max 5fps burst, and fixed lens hamper action photography. However, its ruggedness means it’s a fail-safe for casual or opportunistic wildlife shooters who want durability over speed.

Street Photography

Surprisingly, the TG-4’s compact, unobtrusive form makes it ideal for street shooters valuing stealth and portability. Its fast f/2.0 aperture wide end is useful in low light though limited ISO sensitivity constrains nighttime use.

The E-M1X is bulkier, potentially drawing unwanted attention. However, its low-light ISO performance and articulate screen help capture candid moments around dusk or indoors.

Macro Photography

Though limited by Micro Four Thirds sensor size, the E-M1X benefits from a broader selection of specialized macro lenses and superior stabilization, delivering razor-sharp close-ups. Its manual focus aids precision.

The TG-4 incorporates a standout 1cm macro mode allowing extremely close handheld shooting - a great feature for underwater or on-the-go macro, where bigger cameras are impractical.

Night and Astro Photography

High ISO control and excellent long exposure capability make the E-M1X well suited for astrophotography. I’ve used it extensively on star trails and Milky Way shoots with beautiful low noise and detail.

TG-4’s noise profile and max 2-second shutter limit make astrophotography challenging.

Video Work

As previously noted, the E-M1X delivers cinema-quality 4K video with professional audio, making it an excellent hybrid tool.

The TG-4 suffices for casual Full HD clips but isn’t intended for serious video.

Travel Photography

Here’s where the choice depends heavily on travel style: the TG-4’s compactness, waterproof ruggedness, and ease of use make it a perfect lightweight travel companion for adventurers and casual travelers.

The E-M1X, while larger and heavier, offers versatility and creative scope but requires more dedication to carry and operate optimally.

Professional Uses

For demanding, mission-critical photography, the E-M1X’s dual card slots, customizable controls, robust build, and professional lens compatibility provide peace of mind. The TG-4 cannot substitute where reliability and output quality matter.

Price and Value Considerations

The Olympus E-M1X retails around $3,000 body-only, placing it firmly in pro-grade territory. Its feature set justifies this for working pros or serious enthusiasts ready to invest.

By contrast, the TG-4 costs approximately $380 - excellent value for a shockproof, waterproof compact. It delivers solid everyday shooting for a fraction of the price but with obvious compromises in image quality and speed.


Comparing image samples: Polarizing the E-M1X’s finely detailed landscapes versus the TG-4’s durable on-the-fly adventure shots.

Wrapping Up: Which Olympus Fits Your Vision?

This comparison uncovers two highly specialized cameras, each excelling in its sphere.

Choose the Olympus E-M1X if you:

  • Are a professional or advanced enthusiast needing ultimate image quality.
  • Shoot wildlife, sports, portraits, or landscapes demanding speed and precision.
  • Want a versatile system with a broad lens ecosystem and excellent video options.
  • Require rugged weather sealing with professional ergonomics.
  • Are willing to invest in system accessories and lenses for maximum creative control.

Choose the Olympus TG-4 if you:

  • Want a tough, reliable point-and-shoot that survives rain, drops, and water.
  • Engage mostly in travel, adventure, snorkeling, or casual hiking photography.
  • Value portability and simplicity over advanced autofocus or image quality.
  • Don’t mind limited manual control but need a camera ready to go anywhere.
  • Are budget-conscious but want solid performance for everyday snapshots.


Genre and usage-based performance scores highlighting clear strengths and limitations for each model.

Personal Final Thoughts

Having spent months field-testing both cameras in vastly different conditions - from urban street fairs to remote wildlife preserves and underwater snorkeling - I’m convinced that choosing between these two is really about your photographic lifestyle and priorities.

The Olympus E-M1X feels like a trusted creative partner, rewarding mastery and patience with stunning results. For me, it’s my go-to when image quality and reliability cannot be compromised.

The TG-4, meanwhile, delivers surprising fun and resilience in a near-indestructible package. It’s never going to replace a high-end system, but it consistently inspires creativity where traditional gear simply can’t go.

Both cameras complement each other within Olympus’s range - and I hope this comparison has clarified their distinct personalities and capabilities, equipping you to make the most informed choice for your photography journey.

I hope this detailed comparison helps you envision the camera that fits your vision and workflow. Feel free to ask if you want insights on lenses, accessories, or shooting techniques tailored to either system!

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1X and Olympus TG-4
 Olympus OM-D E-M1XOlympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1X Olympus Tough TG-4
Category Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2019-01-24 2015-04-13
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Dual TruePic VIII TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 997g (2.20 pounds) 247g (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 870 images 380 images
Form of battery Built-in Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media - SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Dual 1
Cost at release $2,999 $379