Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Updated by Panasonic ZS60
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1X was launched 4 years after the ZS50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1X matches up vs the ZS50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic ZS50
E-M1X | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | January 2015 | Newer by 50 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-M1X
ZS50 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic ZS50
E-M1X | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X has physical dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS50 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1X and the ZS50.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1X and ZS50 is 54 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1X and ZS50.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will show more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer E-M1X should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 lb) | 243g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery form | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Price at release | $2,999 | $350 |