Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus E-PL9, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is very close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 II was launched 4 years prior to the E-PL9 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M5 II scores against the E-PL9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus E-PL9
E-M5 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus E-M5 II
E-PL9 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | February 2015 | More modern by 36 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Clearer display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus E-PL9
E-M5 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys outer dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus E-PL9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 II vs the E-PL9.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and E-PL9 is 80 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The picture underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and E-PL9.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you should really consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged E-M5 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 8.6 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 380g (0.84 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $699 | $599 |