Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M5 II was released 4 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M5 II matches up versus the XZ-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus XZ-1
E-M5 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 50 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper screen (+423k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M5 II
XZ-1 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-1
E-M5 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got physical measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 II vs the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a31ab/a31ab16f55c23ce4716ba920ed02363b8b6e8c11" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and XZ-1 is 80 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9be75/9be75fbd62d8d33d1becbcaafd172d6b4540a383" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture below should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and XZ-1.
Plainly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will give greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f561/3f561f25b326125884a6b805e2f0ebdeda42df41" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042f1/042f126e176b84310aa341b424613da3f379f380" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus XZ-1 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 896 | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 320 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $699 | $567 |