Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
84
Overall
66
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Revealed February 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M5
  • New Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M5 II was released 4 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M5 II matches up versus the XZ-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus XZ-1

 E-M5 II XZ-1 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2011More modern by 50 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k614kSharper screen (+423k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 XZ-1 E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-1

 E-M5 II XZ-1 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got physical measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 II vs the XZ-1.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and XZ-1 is 80 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture below should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and XZ-1.

Plainly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will give greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Portrait photography camera
72
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
45
you can focus manually
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Street photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography details
82
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
weather proof
great ISO range (25,600)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
more heavy than average (275 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
65
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
low battery pack (310 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
good battery (320 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography factors
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography factors
74
weather proof
boasts focus by touch
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
low battery pack (310 shots)
62
good battery (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (275g)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
74
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proof
low battery pack (310 per charge)
54
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (320 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.63")
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging info
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging info
82
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external microphone support
31
quite wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than average (275g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-1
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIOlympus XZ-1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Olympus XZ-1
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2015-02-06 2011-01-26
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII TruePic V
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3664 x 2752
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 81 11
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 469g (1.03 lbs) 275g (0.61 lbs)
Dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 34
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 18.8
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 10.4
DXO Low light score 896 117
Other
Battery life 310 photos 320 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $699 $567