Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14843/14843fe54ad829f1dcedf3904c1935557340eb3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and FS15 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FS15 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M5 II was manufactured 6 years later than the FS15 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M5 II grades vs the FS15 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FS15
E-M5 II | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 74 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus E-M5 II
FS15 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FS15
E-M5 II | FS15 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II has external dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Panasonic FS15 has measurements of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 II vs the FS15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0afc1/0afc16c66400805b43bf8fc556d37d741ed22887" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and FS15 is 80 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e2a8/4e2a8c2421febc5789a247c35bf6e34e788fec5e" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and FS15.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a721/4a721f7b13beecbf79487a3281e1621ed066196b" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dfd2/5dfd2433be0bd02a3d122764d4aa5666b3dccd4a" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2009-01-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $699 | $180 |