Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Later Model is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Sony A200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is very well matched but the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-630 iHS was manufactured 4 years later than the A200 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-630 iHS grades vs the A200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Sony A200
TG-630 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2008 | Fresher by 55 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
A200 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Sony A200
TG-630 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-630 iHS provides exterior measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Sony A200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6363/b6363ee2978c27a7af4acf75a23dcbe089fb3d35" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and A200 is 94 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fb56/4fb56fcf23fbf98a62556d74a701ede7862edd03" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The visual below will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and A200.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-630 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will give you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher TG-630 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02c06/02c068c161209e8e14d5252cf4b284610f2ca63b" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06a9e/06a9eebae9eb8b0fbf1b9b7887180ed44d4c0d83" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $200 | $100 |