Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10
Portability
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
41 Overall
39
96 Imaging
39 Features
41 Overall
39
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Sony TX10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TX10 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TX10 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M5 II was released 3 years after the TX10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX10 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M5 II matches up against the TX10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Sony TX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony TX10
| E-M5 II | TX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 43 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX10 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| TX10 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony TX10
| E-M5 II | TX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Sony TX10 has specifications of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 II vs the TX10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and TX10 is 80 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The pic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and TX10.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II offers the bigger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier. The fresher E-M5 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography advice
Sony TX10 Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW files
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Street photography with Sony TX10
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts touch focus
weather proofing
good high ISO (25,600)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch to focus
environment proof
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony TX10 as a Sports photography camera
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
weather proofing
bad battery power (310 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proof
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony TX10 as a Travel photography camera
weather proofing
boasts touch focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
bad battery power (310 per charge)
environment proof
comes with touch to focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography info
Sony TX10 Landscape photography info
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
bad battery power (310 per charge)
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging features
Sony TX10 Vlogging features
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes mic jack
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX10 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-02-06 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 469 gr (1.03 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $699 | $309 |