Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M5 III was manufactured 6 years later than the SZ-16 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up vs the SZ-16 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-M5 III | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | January 2013 | Fresher by 83 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 III
SZ-16 iHS | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-M5 III | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III provides physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has sizing of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 III and the SZ-16 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and SZ-16 iHS is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and SZ-16 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will offer more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2019-10-17 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 220 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,199 | $230 |