Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M5 III was brought out 6 years after the XZ-10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus XZ-10
E-M5 III | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 82 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M5 III
XZ-10 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus XZ-10
E-M5 III | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III features outside dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III versus the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5661/d56611f96f627b12c31dbf2e3b809c1785c64766" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and XZ-10 is 80 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dda15/dda15f35972acf6ed8ba7ffe4c70e5372abe07fb" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The image underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and XZ-10.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will render greater detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cade/6cade3bb7b05ad804b8b4a8c844fc63861931847" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/901a2/901a2d97941a2d9ec866c1c009a4cff30aa5ba63" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,199 | $428 |