Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M5 III was launched 8 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M5 III scores vs the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus VR-320
E-M5 III | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 101 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-M5 III
VR-320 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus VR-320
E-M5 III | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III has got outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III against the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0546/b05463149a9b50e437dc32f7f2a2c2763d0afa40" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and VR-320 is 80 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1413/e141342593f4f6812510e84cf73880315809620d" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and VR-320.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will render greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85274/85274b21bd1c4ac2725d8ba16f594c8da5e478bd" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47391/473914e028e5a03add516f4dc84f78f0ef40af32" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2019-10-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $1,199 | $179 |