Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Released October 2019
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
  • Replacement is OM System OM-5
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 III was launched 8 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M5 III scores vs the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus VR-320

 E-M5 III VR-320 
AnnouncedOctober 2019July 2011Fresher by 101 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-M5 III

 VR-320 E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus VR-320

 E-M5 III VR-320 
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III has got outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III against the VR-320.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and VR-320 is 80 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and VR-320.

To sum up, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will render greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
77
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
exports RAW files
33
decent MP (14MP)
supports face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
83
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts focus via touch
environment proof
great high ISO (25,600)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography information
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography information
76
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (30.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect AF
bad battery power (310 CIPA)
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
77
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
boasts focus via touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery power (310 shots)
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography factors
77
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proof
bad battery power (310 per charge)
42
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging highlights
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
84
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes external mic support
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIIOlympus VR-320
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Olympus VR-320
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2019-10-17 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic III
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 30.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414 grams (0.91 pounds) 158 grams (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $1,199 $179