Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Newer Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic ZR1, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M5 III was manufactured 10 years after the ZR1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M5 III grades against the ZR1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic ZR1
E-M5 III | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | July 2009 | Newer by 125 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-M5 III
ZR1 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic ZR1
E-M5 III | ZR1 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III provides external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR1 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic ZR1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 III vs the ZR1.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and ZR1 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and ZR1.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will give you extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,199 | $280 |