Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Older Model is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M5 and Sony A290, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the A290 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 was manufactured 24 months later than the A290 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M5 matches up vs the A290 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Sony A290
E-M5 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-M5
A290 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Sony A290
E-M5 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 provides physical measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 and Sony A290 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 versus the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/331c4/331c444d70b8b03a97187067844eec8217a7dd72" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and A290 is 81 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecf29/ecf295ddce28a651e54c1d23dc7747c4d75c5c38" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 and A290.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M5 will show greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M5 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24981/2498105419677ec1bd7d08aa97c7db93f73a7338" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94195/94195630cbc3e57681287e108eb0bf25f4b22144" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2010-06-09 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 610k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 290 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $799 | $600 |