Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d60/91d606f8f15554d192c44ec0e68c877e6a1eff9a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Released August 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P3 was brought out 2 years later than the ZS3 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-P3 matches up versus the ZS3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Panasonic ZS3
E-P3 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 28 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-P3
ZS3 | E-P3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic ZS3
E-P3 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P3 comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS3 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-P3 compared to the ZS3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/856d1/856d14ca52fc298c9adcb8da787d921de3ccd6a8" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P3 and ZS3 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45a96/45a96b584681be1e0c68e262d5285eed22a67fb3" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P3 and ZS3.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-P3 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-P3 will give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The younger E-P3 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/149ff/149ff7e5028f4ab02463d4ffb43a8e087e06963a" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51702/51702a4a2943e41660b03f132ff7819ae2ee79d0" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-08-17 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369g (0.81 pounds) | 229g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $0 | $200 |