Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Released August 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-P2
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A230
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-P3 versus Sony A200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty close but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-P3 was announced 3 years after the A200 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-P3 scores vs the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Sony A200
E-P3 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | July 2008 | More modern by 38 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-P3
A200 | E-P3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Sony A200
E-P3 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-P3 enjoys external dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P3 versus Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P3 compared to the A200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P3 and A200 is 86 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and A200.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-P3 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-P3 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-P3 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2011-08-17 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369 grams (0.81 pounds) | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 51 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $0 | $100 |