Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44cce/44ccecc06f21be88cbe2c5ec4d2ed5935f92f28a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 front"
82 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 360g - 124 x 84 x 45mm
- Released January 2009
- Later Model is Panasonic G2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic G1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the G1 (12MP) is very well matched but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and G1 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The XZ-10 was unveiled 4 years after the G1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-10 matches up against the G1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Panasonic G1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic G1
XZ-10 | G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G1 over the Olympus XZ-10
G1 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic G1
XZ-10 | G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic G1 has dimensions of 124mm x 84mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 360 grams (0.79 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic G1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-10 versus the G1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d23/05d23b632721c7fc67cec9585117f70a45e9d6de" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and G1 is 91 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba4df/ba4df2572d2c00b30e4176e5d8d783c65361a059" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and G1.
To sum up, both of those cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 offers the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF trickier. The more recent XZ-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f78d/9f78dc43aa0b1fa12bac5d83fd0123e8754caafb" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa90/4fa90d833cbe48a67d8e65b287973214aaa5b7ff" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2009-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 360 gr (0.79 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 124 x 84 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 53 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 463 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $428 | $0 |