Olympus E-P3 vs Sony A77: A Hands-On Exploration of Two 2011 Veterans

In the ever-evolving world of digital photography, cameras launched just a decade ago might feel like distant relatives in technology terms. Yet, models like the Olympus PEN E-P3 and the Sony SLT-A77 stand as fascinating relics - each catering to different user needs while showcasing innovations that shaped mirrorless and DSLR hybrid cameras. Having personally tested well over a thousand cameras in my 15 years of hands-on work, these two deserve a comparison that goes beyond specs, digging into real use cases, ergonomics, and the nuanced performance aspects that’ll help you decide which one might suit your needs - even today.

Let’s unpack each carefully, assess their shared strengths and shortcomings, and see where they best fit in various photography disciplines and professional workflows.

First Impressions: Compact Elegance Meets Mid-Size Power

When you first pick up these two, their bodies tell distinct stories. The Olympus E-P3 sports the classic rangefinder-style mirrorless design, compact and clean - ideal if portability is a top concern. In contrast, the Sony A77 comes with a traditional DSLR-sized body featuring a solid grip and heftier build that immediately suggests robustness.

My fingers settled quickly on the E-P3’s smaller, lighter frame (369g vs 732g for the A77), which feels perfect for street shooting or travel. By comparison, the A77’s larger size (143 x 104 x 81mm) lends itself to heavier lenses and extended handheld shooting sessions without fatigue, albeit at the cost of bulkier bags and more noticeable presence.

Physically, the E-P3 is slim and stylish with a minimalist interface, while the A77’s traditional DSLR controls give you quick access to advanced features and are customizable - a boon when shooting fast-moving subjects.

Control Layout and Usability: Minimalist Charm vs Feature-Rich Interface

The design extends to top-plate controls and interfaces. Olympus embraced simplicity but didn’t skimp on essentials; its clean layout with a few dedicated dials makes it approachable for enthusiasts without overwhelming beginners.

Compare that with the Sony A77’s all-in control-heavy top deck, complete with an illuminated mode dial, dedicated ISO dial, and exposure controls that tell you you've entered the semi-professional league.

In real-world use, I found the E-P3 intuitive after a short adjustment, but the lack of a built-in electronic viewfinder - the E-P3 requires an optional unit - can slow down composition in bright lighting. The Sony A77’s impressive electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 2359k-dot resolution immediately immerses you in the scene; it’s arguably one of the best EVFs of its generation.

Sensor Tech and Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs APS-C

Underneath that compact Olympus is a 12MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.3x13mm. Meanwhile, Sony packs a much larger 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor at 23.5x15.6mm in the A77 - the difference isn’t just in MP count but in sensor area, which directly shapes image quality, dynamic range, and noise performance.

In the lab and real-world shooting, the Sony's bigger sensor delivers more detailed images (6000 x 4000 max resolution vs Olympus’s 4032 x 3024), noticeably richer dynamic range (13.2 EV vs 10.1 EV), better color depth, and superior high ISO noise handling - important if you push above ISO 800 in challenging light.

The E-P3’s sensor, paired with Olympus’s TruePic VI processor, does surprisingly well for an entry-level mirrorless, producing vibrant skin tones and respectable detail in good lighting. However, shadows tend to show noise sooner, and fine details can soften slightly compared to the Sony’s output.

Screen and Viewfinder: Touch-Enabled OLED vs Articulated LCD and EVF

If you favor composing on the back screen or live view, the E-P3’s 3-inch 614k-dot OLED touchscreen with anti-fingerprint coating grants decent image review and intuitive touch autofocus. However, the screen is fixed, limiting versatility in composing unusual angles.

Sony steps up here with a 3-inch 921k-dot fully articulated LCD offering more flexibility for video shooters, macro photographers, and vloggers.

The A77 also delivers an impressive built-in electronic viewfinder - bright, high-res, and lag-free - versus the Olympus, where the optional EVF is sold separately. This makes the Sony more competent in bright daylight and tracking fast subjects through the viewfinder.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Mirrorless Contrast-Detection vs SLT Hybrid Phase-Detection

This is a fascinating battleground. The Olympus E-P3 relies on contrast-detection autofocus with 35 focus points and face detection. It works well for static subjects and slow action but is comparatively slower and less consistent when tracking erratic subjects or shooting continuous bursts (3 fps).

The Sony A77’s standout is its Hybrid SLT design, meaning a fixed translucent mirror allows real-time phase-detection autofocus with 19 focus points (11 cross-type). The system excels at speedy AF lock, amazing tracking accuracy for birds or sports, and faster continuous shooting at 12 fps - my field tests saw the A77 handle sports shoots with far fewer tracking misses.

If you shoot wildlife or fast-paced sports, forget the E-P3’s pedestrian 3 fps burst and snappier AF on the A77.

Image Stabilization: Sensor-Based Support Across the Board

Both cameras boast sensor-based image stabilization, helping hand-shake compensation regardless of lens choice - a significant feature. Olympus’s IS is respectable but doesn’t rival modern 5-axis steadying. Sony’s sensor-shift IS also makes a difference but is quieter on pitch than newer models.

For macro or night work handheld, both improve sharpness somewhat, but for longer telephoto wildlife lenses on the A77, IS coupled with a bigger sensor provides a real advantage.

Lens Ecosystems: Micro Four Thirds Simplicity vs Minolta A-Mount Richness

Lens choice profoundly influences your photographic capabilities. The E-P3 leverages the Micro Four Thirds mount with 107 native lenses available - a highly flexible and compact system. This range spans primes to zooms, including excellent Olympus and Panasonic options.

The Sony A77 employs the legacy Sony/Minolta Alpha (A-mount), boasting an extensive 143-lens catalog, including specialized telephotos, fast primes, and third-party options. While larger and heavier, compatible glass here can satisfy pros demanding ultimate reach or speed.

Your decision here boils down to portability vs. optical range and pro-grade lens availability.

Battery Life and Storage: Longer Endurance and Versatility on Sony

Olympus’s BLS-5 battery offers about 330 shots per charge, which is decent given the pocketable size but falls short on full-day shoots. The Sony NP-FM500H yields roughly 470 shots, better but still needs a spare battery for serious work.

Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. The Sony adds compatibility for Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick formats - good if invested in Sony’s ecosystem already.

Weather Sealing and Durability: Sony’s Edge for Professional Use

Neither camera is waterproof or crushproof, but the Sony A77 features environmental sealing - dust and moisture resistant chassis armor designed for outdoor, rugged use, making it more reliable for landscape or field sports photographers.

The Olympus E-P3’s body remains unsealed, better suited for controlled environments or casual use.

Connectivity and Multimedia: Modest by Today’s Standards

Neither has Bluetooth or NFC; Olympus surprisingly has no wireless whatsoever. Sony supports Eye-Fi cards for wireless image transfer, and both include HDMI and USB 2.0 ports. The A77 additionally includes built-in GPS - a boon for travelers logging location data.

Video capabilities on both support 1080p Full HD recording at 60 fps (Olympus) or 60/24 fps (Sony) with handy AVCHD and proprietary modes. Sony’s microphone input is a game-changer for serious videographers wanting external audio quality; Olympus has no mic or headphone jacks.

Real-World Use Case Roundup by Photography Genre

To make this really practical, here’s how the cameras stack up across common photography disciplines:

Olympus E P3 front Olympus E P3 screen back Sony A77 front Sony A77 screen back

1. Portrait Photography

Face and eye detection autofocus exist on both, with the Olympus’s touch-enabled AF providing some quick focus taps for skin tones and shallow depth-of-field shots. However, the Sony’s larger sensor produces smoother skin gradations and more natural colors.

The Sony also boasts better bokeh due to larger sensors and lenses with wider apertures available in A-mount. If portraits are your bread and butter, especially with demanding client expectations, the A77 feels like the better pick.

2. Landscape Photography

The Sony’s wider dynamic range and larger sensor clearly dominate, giving you latitude in recovering shadows and highlights without ugly noise.

Its environmental sealing allows safer shooting in variable weather conditions. The articulated LCD helps with composing challenging low-angle shots without backache.

Meanwhile, Olympus’s compact size eases carrying multiple lenses on hikes, albeit at the expense of raw detail.

3. Wildlife Photography

Fast autofocus, high burst frame rates, and long-lens compatibility put the Sony far ahead here.

The E-P3’s contrast AF and slow 3 fps frame rate struggle with birds in flight or jumpy critters, whereas the A77 stands up to mid-level telephoto challenges with far less missed focus.

4. Sports Photography

Speed is king: 12 fps burst mode and that quick SLT phase-detection AF system on the Sony really shine.

I remember covering a local soccer match with the A77 and was able to nail sequences that would’ve been tough on the E-P3.

5. Street Photography

Here, the Olympus’s small size, discrete shutter, and touch interface are advantages - you won’t intimidate subjects or struggle with bulk.

Sony’s more imposing silhouette can be a turnoff, although its faster AF helps when fleeting moments require quick reflexes.

6. Macro Photography

The articulated screen on the A77 and the extensive lens lineup for macro primes make it more versatile here.

Sensor-shift IS on both helps, but manual focus precision is generally easier on the Sony due to better magnification options in the EVF.

7. Night and Astro Photography

Sony’s better high ISO performance and cleaner shadows pay dividends when shooting stars or cityscapes in low light.

Olympus struggles with ISO noise beyond 1600, limiting exposure flexibility.

8. Video Capabilities

Both deliver 1080p video, but Sony’s inclusion of microphone input stands out for audio quality.

The fully articulated screen on the A77 supports vlogging-style self-recording, while Olympus’s fixed screen feels limiting.

9. Travel Photography

Lightweight, compact, and simple interface give Olympus the edge for travelers who prioritize carry weight and ease over speed.

Sony gains on versatility and image quality but demands a larger bag and extra batteries.

10. Professional Work

Sony’s superior file quality, broader lens support, and reliability via weather sealing align more comfortably with pro workflows.

Olympus is great as a second camera or for casual assignments but less suited to high-end commercial work.

Comprehensive Performance Ratings Reflect Strengths and Weaknesses

Allow me to summarize their core performance metrics based on DxOMark scores and hands-on testing:

The Sony A77, with its 78-point DxOMark rating, stands well above the E-P3 at 51 - a meaningful technical difference in color depth, dynamic range, and low-light capabilities.

Genre-Specific Score Card

Not all cameras are equally effective across disciplines. Here’s a practical breakdown based on my experience and benchmarking:

This visualizes how Sony leads in action genres (Wildlife, Sports) while Olympus holds its ground in Casual, Street, and Travel photography.

Summing Up: Who Should Buy Which?

Choose Olympus E-P3 if:

• You want a pocketable, stylish camera for everyday use, travel, and street photography.
• You prioritize ease of use, touch interface, and a friendly Micro Four Thirds lens system.
• You don’t require ultra-fast autofocus or extreme low-light performance.
• Your budget is tighter and you favor a lightweight setup for casual shots.

Choose Sony A77 if:

• You need a rugged, feature-packed camera for sports, wildlife, landscape, and pro-level portraiture.
• Fast autofocus, high burst rates, and superior image quality are non-negotiable.
• You want full HD video with better manual audio control and articulation for creative shooting angles.
• You invest in the A-mount lens ecosystem or own legacy Minolta glass.

Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Cameras with Different Missions

The Olympus PEN E-P3 and Sony SLT-A77 exemplify two distinct approaches in the 2011 camera market: the former compact, approachable, and mirrorless; the latter bigger, faster, and geared toward enthusiasts who demand DSLR-like performance with an innovative translucent mirror system.

Having worked extensively with both, I see the E-P3 as a wonderful compact do-it-all - particularly for street shooters or travel junkies who prioritize convenience and style. The Sony A77 resonates stronger with those who need speed, image fidelity, and versatility over pocketability.

When hunting for a camera in this era, I always encourage users to factor in their prioritized genres and usage scenarios - because, as you’ve read here, both cameras are capable beasts but with clearly different personalities.

If you’re still exploring, I thoroughly recommend hands-on trials and asking yourself honestly: how important are burst rates, autofocus tracking, and sensor size to your photography style?

Thanks for reading this in-depth comparison. If you have any questions about older camera tech, lens combos, or workflow tips based on these models, feel free to ask - I’m always happy to share what years of shooting have taught me.

Happy shooting!

End of article.