Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eaa8/2eaa8d035b73ee44320a189d3ab6e657e21b47f9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Released October 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Released June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and ZS5 (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and ZS5 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-P5 was announced 3 years later than the ZS5 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-P5 scores vs the ZS5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery & Panasonic ZS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Panasonic ZS5
E-P5 | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS5 over the Olympus E-P5
ZS5 | E-P5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic ZS5
E-P5 | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P5 has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS5 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-P5 vs the ZS5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffedf/ffedf5d6f9a9e91c1e17fc9647e4e294653f9064" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P5 and ZS5 is 85 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b084/1b08440d31351b7725d719733f6c3e46af950ffc" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P5 and ZS5.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-P5 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-P5 will give you extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger E-P5 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be7ac/be7ac72d5d2fa925694827479b3f807af3998460" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0949b/0949b49a8b456cefaacb87e922db3f2d5afb1141" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-10-03 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 420 gr (0.93 lbs) | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $389 | $300 |