Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-70 was announced 8 years after the DV300F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WG-70 grades vs the DV300F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung DV300F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung DV300F
| WG-70 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 99 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Ricoh WG-70
| DV300F | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung DV300F
| WG-70 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 has got physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-70 against the DV300F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-70 and DV300F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and DV300F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you should expect comparable quality of photos but you should always take the production date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-70 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung DV300F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2020-02-04 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 133g (0.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $200 |