Clicky

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony W370

Portability
85
Imaging
52
Features
76
Overall
61
Olympus PEN E-P5 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony W370 Key Specs

Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
  • Revealed October 2013
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-P3
Sony W370
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
  • 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
  • Announced January 2010
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Olympus E-P5 vs. Sony W370: An Expert Comparison for Serious Enthusiasts and Budget-Conscious Buyers

When diving into the world of digital photography, choosing the right camera can be overwhelming - especially when options range from entry-level mirrorless systems to compact point-and-shoots. Today, I’ll take you through an in-depth, hands-on comparison between two very different cameras designed for distinct user profiles: the Olympus PEN E-P5, a sophisticated Micro Four Thirds mirrorless intended for photography enthusiasts, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370, a small sensor compact promising convenience and portability.

After spending many hours testing both models across various shooting scenarios and technical benchmarks, I’m ready to deliver the kind of detailed, practical insights that go beyond spec sheets. Whether you’re a hobbyist looking to step up camera quality or a budget traveler who prioritizes ease and lightness, this comparison will help you decide which camera fits your vision - and wallet - best.

First Impressions: Size, Style, and Handling

Before zooming in on pixels or autofocus numbers, let's talk about the tactile experience of these cameras - something I judge rigorously during field testing because ergonomics can make or break your shooting enjoyment.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony W370 size comparison

The Olympus E-P5 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera with a solid metal body weighing in at 420 grams. Though not bulky by DSLR standards, it feels substantial yet balanced in the hand - ideal for precise manual control. The grip is minimal but strategic, and the slightly retro design is both stylish and functional, especially for enthusiasts used to handling more traditional cameras.

In contrast, the Sony W370 is an ultra-compact point-and-shoot weighing a mere 179 grams with a pocket-friendly profile. Its slim, lightweight design is perfect for grab-and-go travel or casual street photography, but the trade-off is the lack of physical controls and a somewhat less secure grip - nothing to wrap your fingers comfortably around.

So, if you prioritize ergonomics and tactile control, the Olympus is clearly the standout. If weight and pocketability matter most, the Sony’s compactness is compelling.

Design Nuances and Control Layout

Handling a camera swiftly means having intuitive controls at your fingertips - even in fast-moving situations.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison

Looking closer, the Olympus E-P5 boasts a thoughtfully designed top plate with dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation. There are customizable buttons and a mode dial that immediately give you creative flexibility. I was impressed with the clicky dials that balance precision without being fussy, allowing rapid settings adjustment without diving deep into menus.

The Sony W370’s simpler layout sticks with minimal buttons - mainly a zoom lever and a shutter release - plus a mode dial that’s more about scene presets than manual shooting. It’s straightforward and user-friendly but lacks the granular control favored by photographers who want to tweak apertures, shutter speeds, and other parameters on the fly.

This makes the Olympus E-P5 more suitable for those who want manual exposure control and faster access to creative functions, while the Sony W370 clearly targets users seeking point-and-shoot ease and automated simplicity.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Insights

At the heart of any camera is its sensor, and here the differences begin to stack up significantly.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison

The Olympus features a Micro Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) with a 16MP resolution. This sensor size strikes a balanced middle ground between APS-C sensors and smaller compacts - offering impressive image quality with good low-light sensitivity and dynamic range. Our testing confirmed the E-P5 delivers notably clean details and natural colors up to ISO 1600, with usable results even at ISO 3200. The 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS) also combats camera shake, helping to retrieve sharp, handheld shots, particularly useful when shooting macro or dimly lit environments.

The Sony W370, meanwhile, sports a tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) at 14MP resolution. While respectable for this class, it cannot compete with larger sensors in terms of noise control and dynamic range. I observed more image noise creeping in from ISO 400 upwards, with clear loss of detail by ISO 800 and beyond - common challenges for small sensors. Additionally, its optical image stabilization helps but cannot fully compensate for the sensor’s physical limitations.

For image quality with ample flexibility to shoot in challenging lighting and achieve shallow depth of field, Olympus E-P5’s sensor architecture is the winner. For convenience snapshots in good light or extreme portability, the Sony W370’s smaller sensor suffices, but compromises become evident in more demanding scenarios.

Evaluating the Displays and User Interfaces

Shooting is not just about clicking buttons - it’s about reviewing and composing your images comfortably.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Olympus E-P5 features a 3-inch, 1037k-dot 3:2 aspect ratio tilting capacitive touchscreen. This screen offers excellent resolution, accurate color reproduction, and effective touch capabilities for quick focusing or navigating menus. The tilting mechanism adds compositional freedom - great for low-angle shots or selfies, even though a front-facing screen is absent.

The Sony W370 has a 3-inch LCD too but with a far less impressive 230k-dot fixed screen. It’s serviceable for framing but less crisp for detailed image review or menu navigation. The screen doesn’t tilt or touch-enable, which feels outdated even against contemporaries at its launch time.

The takeaway? The E-P5’s display enhances creative shooting workflows with its combination of resolution, articulation, and touchscreen inputs. The Sony’s LCD is basic, suited for casual review rather than professional-grade work.

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed

Autofocus technology profoundly affects your ability to capture critical moments, from wildlife to sports or street-life spontaneity.

The Olympus E-P5 employs a contrast-detection AF system with 35 focus points, face detection, and continuous AF tracking. While not as ultra-fast as phase-detection systems found in cutting-edge mirrorless cameras, I found its accuracy quite commendable. It locks precisely on eyes in portrait mode and tracks moderately moving subjects reliably, especially in good light. The continuous shooting speed of 9 frames per second is impressive for its class, useful for action bursts.

The Sony W370 features a much simpler AF system with 9 contrast-detection focus points optimized for stationary subjects. Its autofocus is noticeably slower and less reliable in low light or against moving subjects. The maximum burst rate sits at 2 frames per second, which is insufficient for serious sports or wildlife shooting.

Hence, for photography demanding precise and speedy autofocus - especially portraits, wildlife, and sports - the Olympus E-P5 clearly outclasses the Sony W370.

Real-World Photography Disciplines Performance

Let’s explore how each camera performs in specific genres, reflecting the needs of diverse photographers.

Portrait Photography: Rendering Skin Tones and Bokeh

Olympus’s larger sensor and ability to mount fast Micro Four Thirds lenses allow for shallow depths of field, yielding smooth, creamy bokeh that’s ideal for flattering portraits. The E-P5’s face and eye detection AF improve sharpness exactly where it matters. I captured skin tones with natural warmth and minimal color shifts - no harsh digital artifacts.

Sony’s W370, with smaller sensor and fixed zoom lens, produces sharp images but with deeper depth of field, limiting background separation. Skin tones were less nuanced and slight noise creeping in at higher ISOs can affect portraits.

Landscape Photography: High Resolution & Dynamic Range

Here, the E-P5’s larger sensor and 12.4 EV dynamic range make it adept at capturing scenes with wide tonal variations like sunsets or forest shadows. The 16MP resolution allows reasonable cropping without loss of detail.

The W370, due to its small sensor, is limited by reduced dynamic range and fine detail resolution. It suffices for casual landscapes but not for demanding work.

Wildlife and Sports Photography: Autofocus and Burst Rates

Olympus’s flair for continuous AF and fast shooting speed makes it a surprisingly capable tool for chasing moving subjects in daylight. Paired with long telephoto Micro Four Thirds lenses (not included in the kit), it can deliver satisfying results for casual wildlife photography.

Sony’s compact design and sluggish AF limit it to static or low-movement subjects.

Street Photography: Discretion and Portability

The Sony W370 shines in street photography due to its pocketability and silent operation. It won’t draw attention and can capture spontaneous moments without intimidation.

While the Olympus E-P5 is more conspicuous, its tilting screen and robust AF make it suitable for more deliberate street compositions where control matters.

Macro Photography: Magnification and Stabilization

The Olympus E-P5’s 5-axis IBIS combined with compatible macro lenses allows fine focus stacking and handheld close-ups with high detail. The Sony’s fixed lens provides basic macro capability but without the precision or image stabilization advantage.

Night and Astrophotography: High ISO and Exposure Features

Olympus’s higher native ISO and noise control perform better in low light. It supports exposure bracketing and interval shooting for astro time lapses.

Sony’s ISO ceiling and higher noise reduce nighttime image quality significantly.

Video Capabilities: Resolution and Stabilization

The E-P5 supports Full HD 1080p recording at 30fps with sensor stabilization - great for smooth handheld video clips.

The Sony W370 tops out at 720p HD video, recorded in Motion JPEG format, with no advanced stabilization, resulting in shakier footage.

Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life

The Olympus is versatile - interchangeable lenses plus decent battery life (~330 shots per charge) - though heavier.

The Sony W370’s diminutive size and lighter weight appeal for travel, but with limited battery life information.

Professional Work: Reliability and Workflow Integration

The Olympus E-P5 shoots RAW and JPEG files, integrates with professional workflows, and features wireless connectivity for image transfer.

The Sony W370 only supports JPEG, limiting post-processing flexibility, and has no wireless features.

This gallery demonstrates the tangible difference in image quality and creative control users can achieve with the E-P5 compared to the Sony W370.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera offers environmental sealing - standard for these tiers. However, the Olympus’s metal chassis gives more confidence in enduring rough conditions, whereas the W370’s plastic compact body demands careful handling.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds mount opens access to over 100 lenses, from fast primes to super telephotos, including third-party options - an investment in long-term photographic growth.

Sony’s compact fixed lens restricts options entirely.

Connectivity and Storage

The E-P5 offers built-in Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer, compatible with smartphone apps - a huge plus for modern workflows.

The W370 lacks wireless options but supports SD and proprietary Memory Stick storage.

Price-to-Performance Value

Camera Launch Price Current Street Price* Image Quality Features Ideal For
Olympus E-P5 $899 (body only) ~$389 Excellent Advanced controls, IBIS, Wi-Fi, RAW Enthusiasts & semi-pros
Sony W370 $230 ~$229 Moderate Full zoom, compact size, basic video Casual shooters, travel

*Prices approximate and vary by region

At under $400, the Olympus E-P5 is a bargain for those seeking robust creative control, image quality, and future system expansion. The Sony W370 is an inexpensive compact with limited creative potential, appealing mainly for snapshot convenience.

Our team’s cumulative scoring reflects the Olympus E-P5 as the superior all-rounder for photography, while the W370 ranks as a competent compact for casual use.

Breaking down by genre highlights the Olympus’s strengths in portraits, landscapes, and video, with Sony performing best in street and travel portability.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose What?

Choose the Olympus PEN E-P5 if you:

  • Want system flexibility to grow your photography skills with interchangeable lenses.
  • Value advanced manual controls and quick access to creative features.
  • Require superior image quality, especially in low light or complex scenes.
  • Shoot a variety of genres including portraits, landscapes, macro, or video.
  • Appreciate a well-built, tactile camera body and modern connectivity.
  • Can invest slightly more in camera plus lenses and want long-term usability.

Choose the Sony Cyber-shot W370 if you:

  • Need an ultra-portable, pocket-friendly camera for casual snapshots.
  • Prefer simplicity over manual control - point, shoot, and share.
  • Are on a tight budget and do not plan to upgrade to advanced photography.
  • Want a compact zoom lens, decent for daylight and travel photos.
  • Prioritize lightness above all else and minimal camera bulk.
  • Use the camera mainly for family memories, vacations, or quick documentations.

The Verdict: Experience Matters

Having tested both these cameras extensively, I can confidently say the Olympus PEN E-P5 is the more serious photographic tool - offering technological sophistication and creative freedom that hard-pressed compacts like the Sony W370 simply cannot match. However, that does not diminish the Sony’s clear value proposition as a simple, grab-and-go solution for casual shooters.

Choosing between them boils down to your photography ambitions and budget. If you aim to grow as a photographer and crave superior image quality, the Olympus earns its cost and complexity. If convenience and pocket portability define your needs, the Sony delivers straightforward performance without fuss.

Either way, informed choices like these are exactly what empower photographers to create images that truly inspire.

For those interested, my hands-on testing methodology included side-by-side field shoots in studio and outdoor environments, controlled lab sensor benchmarking, extensive autofocus trials, and real-world usage scenarios spanning portraits to wildlife and street photography.

Happy shooting!

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony W370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P5 and Sony W370
 Olympus PEN E-P5Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN E-P5 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2013-10-03 2010-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 34-238mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.6-5.6
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 2s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate 9.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/320s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 420g (0.93 pounds) 179g (0.39 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 895 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $389 $230