Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1
- Updated by Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-PL1s versus Olympus VG-110, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL1s was announced 2 months earlier than the VG-110 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-PL1s matches up against the VG-110 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus VG-110
E-PL1s | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-PL1s
VG-110 | E-PL1s |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus VG-110
E-PL1s | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2010 | ![]() | February 2011 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1s provides outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL1s versus Olympus VG-110 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL1s versus the VG-110.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65788/65788cff65850832bebf5a4eb5ba8e12cb5e3c13" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and VG-110 is 86 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49282/492820ce902ef518f46211718e6d0778f5a3de6b" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1s and VG-110.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1s has the bigger sensor which will make obtaining bokeh less difficult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8b6e/a8b6ee4e47fcf8158d5644ce633831041ce1fd01" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/352ee/352ee457c9746b3db40d7643fb2900be786cd80c" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus VG-110 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-11-16 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lbs) | 105 gr (0.23 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | 170 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $599 | $150 |