Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL1s was manufactured 13 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-PL1s grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1s and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL1s | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2010 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL1s
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL1s | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1s has outer dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1s versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92a69/92a69d7940523dcb6bac49bc03690c001c8d0b02" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 86 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b620/3b620bb381373a6954c49e86a3a998e60fc0e0ea" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1s and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The E-PL1s offers the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult. The more recent E-PL1s should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c167/5c1677dc39aa90be31641f069f6efb05a743a4a1" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dc80/7dc80a666699dd7f0a4ae7e6ef4e1968df0a52cc" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-11-16 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 pounds) | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 320 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $566 |