Clicky

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
86
Imaging
48
Features
43
Overall
46
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced November 2010
  • Older Model is Olympus E-PL1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-PL2
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Introduced November 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-PL1s was manufactured 13 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-PL1s grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL1s GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
IntroducedNovember 2010November 2009More recent by 13 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL1s

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro E-PL1s 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL1s GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1s has outer dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1s versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 86 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1s and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The E-PL1s offers the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult. The more recent E-PL1s should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Portrait photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography information
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
55
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PL1s
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
62
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography info
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery (290 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
32
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
bad battery pack (320 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Travel photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography info
52
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
not so great battery (290 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
49
flash built-in
bad battery pack (320 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Landscape photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography info
55
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery (290 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
46
you can focus manually
screen size is decent (3 inches)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
bad battery pack (320 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Vlogging advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging advice
30
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
20
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1s and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus PEN E-PL1sRicoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL1s Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-11-16 2009-11-10
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic V GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 50mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 334 grams (0.74 pounds) 453 grams (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures 320 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $599 $566