Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
86 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1
- New Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced August 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL1s was revealed 8 months earlier than the GXR Mount A12 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PL1s grades versus the GXR Mount A12 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| E-PL1s | GXR Mount A12 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus E-PL1s
| GXR Mount A12 | E-PL1s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | November 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| E-PL1s | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1s offers exterior dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has proportions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-PL1s and the GXR Mount A12.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and GXR Mount A12 is 86 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1s and GXR Mount A12.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP but not the same sensor sizes. The E-PL1s includes the smaller sensor which should make getting bokeh more challenging. The more aged E-PL1s will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2010-11-16 | 2011-08-05 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | () |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 9.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 334g (0.74 lb) | 370g (0.82 lb) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | 330 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $349 |
