Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Released November 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic 3D1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and 3D1 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL3 was manufactured very close to the 3D1 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PL3 grades against the 3D1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Panasonic 3D1
| E-PL3 | 3D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus E-PL3
| 3D1 | E-PL3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic 3D1
| E-PL3 | 3D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | November 2011 | Similar generation |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Panasonic 3D1 has dimensions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic 3D1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL3 vs the 3D1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and 3D1 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL3 and 3D1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PL3 contains the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF simpler.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-09-20 | 2011-11-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Truepic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313g (0.69 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 200 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $670 |