Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b251/5b251bf8127050113ed9df295706e333234efade" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL6 front Olympus PEN E-PL6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98111/98111a0b7c2ad20df355c7415ff9f3db6009ee5f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL6 (16MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL6 was manufactured 4 years after the FH3 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL6 matches up vs the FH3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL6 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Panasonic FH3
E-PL6 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 56 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-PL6
FH3 | E-PL6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Panasonic FH3
E-PL6 | FH3 |
---|
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL6 features physical measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH3 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL6 compared to the FH3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59a5f/59a5fec3f61059ee871f6ca9530a64b8ba9419b7" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL6 and FH3 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36a5c/36a5cdf8b9ac8699b8e98f7986626c0441bd6d33" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The picture below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL6 and FH3.
Plainly, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL6 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PL6 will produce more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-PL6 should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58226/582269b3d75ba6eff8431db2b9060c1d7998506a" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af75/7af757555bd36e281756b2f4936fd0804457e173" alt="Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL6 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-08-01 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $160 |