Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27217/27217068f8c9495080b1e05c8e540f967ef1c3d8" alt="Pentax X-5 front Pentax X-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Pentax X-5 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the X-5 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the X-5 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The X-5 was brought out 12 months later than the GR Digital IV so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax X-5 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the X-5 grades against the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax X-5 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax X-5 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X-5 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
X-5 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Pentax X-5
GR Digital IV | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax X-5 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
X-5 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax X-5 comes with outer measurements of 119mm x 86mm x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") accompanied by a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Pentax X-5 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the X-5 vs the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/874e1/874e1084d59fc97ca7e64908fe8b9793b3d0c5f9" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X-5 and GR Digital IV is 65 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aa81/1aa8151ece54a0020955706af81fbc34dc31281b" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the X-5 and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X-5 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Pentax X-5 will render greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent X-5 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b57ed/b57ed53e0e533863ff265433cec24f39a073851e" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/919d7/919d7ca6857a6bc45b212add64209475936ab737" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax X-5 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-08-22 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 230 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 gr (1.31 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 390 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $230 | $599 |