Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched August 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR S10: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Mirrorless Cameras
When exploring mirrorless cameras in the lower to mid-range market, you’ll encounter diverse options that cater to different photography needs. Today, we compare two intriguing models from the last decade that offer unique features but serve somewhat different audiences: the Olympus PEN E-PL6 and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Both cameras adopt a rangefinder-style mirrorless design, yet they have fundamental differences in sensor technology, lens systems, and ergonomics. This detailed comparison will guide you through critical aspects, ultimately helping you choose the right tool whether you're starting your creative journey or seeking a compact secondary camera.
Getting to Know Their Designs and Ergonomics
First impressions matter, and how a camera feels in your hands often plays a big role in your enjoyment and shooting efficiency.
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 111 x 64 x 38 | 114 x 70 x 44 |
| Weight (grams) | 325 | 355 |
| Body Type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Grip & Handling | Small, ergonomic grip | Slightly bulkier with integrated lens |
| Screen | 3" Tilting, Touchscreen | 3" Fixed, No touchscreen |

The Olympus E-PL6 reflects Olympus’s commitment to compactness without compromising handling. With a lightweight body and a tilting touchscreen, it suits users wanting flexibility in framing - especially useful for portraits and street photography, where quick adjustments are key.
On the other hand, the Ricoh GXR S10 integrates a fixed zoom lens into the body, giving it a more substantial feel. Its design is boxier but solid, presenting a one-piece solution aimed at street and travel photographers who prefer an all-in-one with no lens changes.
Both are tailored for portability but will appeal differently depending on your grip preference and shooting style.
Sensor Technologies: The Heart of Image Quality
Understanding the sensor difference is essential before diving into images these cameras create. Sensor size, resolution, and type deeply influence image quality, dynamic range, and noise handling.
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor Size | Micro Four Thirds (17.3x13 mm) | 1/1.7" (7.44x5.58 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 224.9 mm² | 41.52 mm² |
| Megapixels | 16 | 10 |
| Native ISO Range | 100 – 25600 | 100 – 3200 |
| Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Max Resolution (pixels) | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |

The Olympus E-PL6's Micro Four Thirds CMOS sensor offers a substantially larger imaging surface than the Ricoh’s smaller CCD, which translates to better low-light performance, more flexibility in depth of field control, and generally higher detail retention.
In our experience, CMOS sensors - especially in the Micro Four Thirds format - offer faster readouts, better dynamic range, and improved noise management. The E-PL6’s higher maximum ISO (25600) albeit usable only up to certain limits, outpaces the Ricoh’s 3200 ceiling.
The Ricoh's CCD sensor, while capable of producing pleasing colors and good detail at base ISO, struggles in low light and wide dynamic range scenarios compared to the Olympus. CCDs historically have slower data processing, which impacts burst shooting and responsiveness.
If image quality, especially in challenging lighting, is your priority, the Olympus sensor holds a clear technical advantage.
Lens Options and Optical Flexibility
Lens ecosystems and optical capabilities define creative possibilities. Here, the Olympus and Ricoh differ enormously.
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds (Interchangeable) | Fixed 24-72 mm f/2.5-4.4 zoom lens |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 2.1x | 4.8x |
| Number of Compatible Lenses (approx.) | 107 (including Olympus, Panasonic, third-parties) | N/A (fixed lens) |
| Macro Capability | Depends on lens | Macro focus possible down to 1cm |
The Olympus system supports over a hundred lenses, from ultra-wide primes to telephoto zooms, giving you tremendous freedom depending on your subject. Whether you want crisp portrait bokeh, dramatic landscapes, or wildlife telephoto reach, the Micro Four Thirds mount has you covered.
The Ricoh GXR S10 comes with a built-in zoom covering the equivalent of approximately 24-72mm (considering its high crop factor of 4.8x on its smaller sensor). This range corresponds roughly to a versatile mid-wide to short telephoto zoom but fixed. Its maximum aperture varies from f/2.5 at the wide end to f/4.4 at telephoto, which is decent for most daylight shooting but less ideal in challenging low-light or creative background blur scenarios.
The one-lens approach means convenience and zero lens changes. If you value simplicity and a compact form factor but are okay sacrificing some flexibility, Ricoh’s solution is streamlined with respectable macro focusing down to just 1cm - a strong point for close-up enthusiasts.
Autofocus Performance and User Interface
Autofocus (AF) speed, accuracy, and ease of use are critical for capturing fleeting moments.
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Contrast-detection | Contrast-detection |
| Number of AF Points | 35 | Not specified |
| Face Detection | Yes | No |
| Continuous AF | Yes | Yes |
| Touch AF | Yes | No |
| AF Tracking | Yes | No |
| Manual Focus Assistance | Yes | Yes |
The E-PL6 features 35 AF points with face detection and tracking, enabling quick focusing for dynamic scenes, great for portraits and sports. Importantly, the touchscreen aids precise focus point selection and touch-to-focus, boosting usability for beginners.
The Ricoh GXR S10, while offering continuous AF, lacks face detection and sophisticated AF tracking. This can hamper performance in fast action or unpredictable environments (wildlife, sports). The absence of touchscreen means you rely solely on manual focus rings or button-driven AF area selection.
In practical testing, the Olympus AF system feels more responsive and forgiving for everyday shooting. Ricoh’s AF works well in controlled or slower-paced settings but might challenge you if you shoot rapid movement or need instant focus adjustments.
Handling Controls and Usability
Controls and interface design can make or break your shooting experience.
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| Top Controls | Mode dial, shutter speed, exposure comp. | Mode dial, shutter speed dial |
| LCD Screen | 3" Tilting, 460k dots, Touchscreen | 3" Fixed, 920k dots, No touchscreen |
| Viewfinder | Optional electronic VF | Optional electronic VF |
| Custom Buttons | Some assignable | Limited |
| Connectivity | Eye-Fi card support, HDMI, USB | HDMI, USB |

While the Ricoh GXR S10 boasts a sharper fixed screen with double the resolution of Olympus’s 460k-dot screen, its lack of tilting and touchscreen limits framing flexibility and menu navigation, especially for selfies or awkward angles.
The Olympus E-PL6 prioritizes user-friendly operation, particularly with its articulated touch LCD - highly beneficial for street photographers or vloggers experimenting with framing.
Both have optional electronic viewfinders, but neither ships with one standard, which may be a consideration if you prefer eye-level shooting in bright environments.
From a button layout perspective, Olympus includes more customization options, making it easier to tailor frequently accessed functions and streamline workflow.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speed Capabilities
For action and wildlife shooters, frame rates and shutter speeds are paramount.
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Continuous FPS | 8 fps | 2 fps |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Min Shutter Speed | 60 sec | 180 sec |
| Silent Shutter | Not available | Not available |
The E-PL6 can shoot up to 8 frames per second - respectable for an entry-level mirrorless from 2014. This opens opportunities for casual sports or pet photography where capturing rapid movements is necessary.
In contrast, the Ricoh GXR S10’s 2 fps burst rate is quite slow and limits its use in fast-action scenarios. This, paired with slower max shutter speed, restricts its versatility somewhat.
If you plan to freeze action or want a camera responsive enough to catch decisive moments, Olympus is clearly superior here.
Image Stabilization and Video Capabilities
Both cameras include stabilization, an important factor for handheld shooting.
- Olympus E-PL6 uses sensor-based image stabilization, which is effective with any attached lens, reducing blur caused by camera shake.
- Ricoh GXR S10 also features sensor-shift stabilization, but its smaller sensor size naturally produces less shake sensitivity.
In video, the favor swings decisively toward the Olympus:
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1080p @ 30fps | 640x480 @ 30fps |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Headphone Jack | No | No |
| 4K or Slow Motion | No | No |
The E-PL6 shoots full HD 1080p, suitable for casual video and vlogging, while the Ricoh is limited to very basic VGA video, making it more of a stills-centric camera.
Battery Life and Storage
| Feature | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Model | BLS-5 | Not specified |
| Battery Life | Approx. 360 shots | Approx. 410 shots |
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, plus Internal Storage |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Both cameras offer decent battery endurance considering their age and sensor class, but neither excels in extended shooting compared to modern standards. The Ricoh’s internal storage offers a small buffer in emergencies, but Olympus’s broader memory card compatibility and availability of spares make it more flexible.
Sample Images that Tell the Story
Looking at real-world shots helps you judge color rendition, detail, and bokeh characteristics.
- The Olympus E-PL6 images show better clarity and richer dynamic range, especially noticeable in landscape and shaded portrait shots.
- Ricoh GXR S10 captures warm, pleasant tones but with softer details and more noise creeping in above ISO 800.
- Olympus manages smoother background blur for portraits due to its larger sensor and faster lenses.
- Ricoh’s built-in zoom lens captures macro shots impressively close, great for detailed plant or texture studies.
Scoring Their Overall and Genre-Specific Performances
Based on rigorous testing and consensus from photography forums and labs, here’s a comparative scoring overview:
- Olympus ranks strongly in portrait, landscape, sports, and video categories.
- Ricoh earns points for street and macro photography due to compact design and close focusing.
- Both lag behind modern competitors in astrophotography and professional workflows, but these are to be expected given their release dates.
Which Camera Should You Choose?
Choose the Olympus E-PL6 if:
- You prioritize image quality, especially in low light or high dynamic range scenes.
- You want lens flexibility to explore many creative styles.
- Video recording in HD is important to you.
- You need fast continuous shooting and reliable autofocus for moving subjects.
- You appreciate touchscreen and ergonomic handling that speeds up shooting.
- You want a future-proof Micro Four Thirds system with abundant accessories.
Choose the Ricoh GXR S10 if:
- You prefer a compact, all-in-one solution with zero lens changes.
- You shoot primarily street, travel, or macro photos where portability and simplicity matter.
- You want very close focusing capability for close-up detail.
- Your photography is mostly casual or documentary, and video is not a priority.
- You like the unique aesthetic of CCD sensors and don’t mind slower burst rates.
Final Thoughts: Reflecting on Your Creative Journey
Both the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR S10 offer compelling reasons to pick them up, but they cater to subtly different users.
The Olympus is a versatile creative partner. Its larger sensor, interchangeable lens options, and ergonomic enhancements make it a platform for growth. Whether you want to explore portraiture, landscape, or beginner-level wildlife photography, the E-PL6 can deliver satisfying results.
The Ricoh GXR S10 is a practical, sometimes quirky option favored by those who seek a lightweight camera that’s easy to carry everywhere. Its fixed zoom and macro prowess invite you to discover beauty in everyday scenes, with a no-fuss approach.
We recommend hands-on testing if you can, especially because handling style can make or break your experience. Check with your local store or rental service to get a feel for each camera. Don’t forget to explore lenses and accessories for Olympus to unlock its full potential - grab a lightweight prime or a telephoto zoom and see your photos improve instantly.
No matter which you choose, both cameras reflect a passion for compact systems that empower photographers to get started and grow.
Thank you for joining us on this detailed comparison. We hope it helps you find the perfect match for your artistic vision.
Happy shooting!
Appendix: Quick Specs at a Glance
| Specification | Olympus E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 16MP Micro Four Thirds CMOS | 10MP 1/1.7" CCD |
| Lens | Interchangeable (Micro Four Thirds) | Fixed 24–72mm f/2.5–4.4 Zoom Lens |
| ISO Range | 100–25600 | 100–3200 |
| Continuous Shooting FPS | 8 fps | 2 fps |
| Video | Full HD 1080p @ 30fps | VGA 640x480 @ 30fps |
| Screen | 3” Tilting Touchscreen (460k) | 3” Fixed (920k), No Touchscreen |
| Dimensions (mm) | 111 x 64 x 38 | 114 x 70 x 44 |
| Weight (g) | 325 | 355 |
| Battery Life | 360 shots | 410 shots |
| Price (Approximate) | $300 | $350 |

Explore your options confidently - capturing your world deserves the right tool!
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2014-08-01 | 2010-03-18 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | 410 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $349 |