Olympus E-PL7 vs E-PL8: Which Entry-Level Mirrorless Still Holds Strong in 2024?

When Olympus released the PEN E-PL7 back in 2014, it instantly attracted attention with its blend of classic styling, compact size, and surprisingly advanced features for an entry-level mirrorless camera. Fast forward two years, and its successor, the E-PL8, appeared on the scene with subtle but meaningful refinements. Both share the Micro Four Thirds mount, TruePic VII processor, and a 16MP sensor, making them close cousins in Olympus’s popular PEN line. But which model truly deserves your hard-earned money today, in 2024?

Having spent countless hours testing cameras across various genres - from portrait shoots under studio lights to wildlife chases - you’ll find this comparison goes beyond mere spec sheets. We’ll dive deep into practical usage, sensor performance, autofocus muscle, and ergonomics, peppered with image samples and real-life workflow insights. So, grab a cup of coffee and join me on this hands-on exploration of the Olympus E-PL7 vs E-PL8.

Getting a Feel: Size, Handling & Controls

The physical feel of a camera often sets the tone for your shooting experience, so let’s start there. Both the E-PL7 and E-PL8 sport the classic rangefinder-style mirrorless body, with dimensions practically identical at 115 x 67 x 38 mm and a waist-friendly weight of 357 grams including battery.

In hand, they’re delightfully light, perfect for extended handheld shooting or travel when bulky DSLRs aren’t an option. However, minor differences in grip texture and button layout subtly influence usability. The E-PL7’s rubberized grip edges provide a slightly more secure hold compared to the E-PL8’s smoother finish, which some photographers might find less reassuring during fast-paced shooting.

Looking at the top view:

The control layout remains consistent - dedicated dials for exposure compensation, shutter speed, and aperture priority modes. Unfortunately, neither has a top LCD panel, which some users might miss for quick status checks. Both models lack fully customizable buttons or joystick controllers - a feature becoming more common even in entry-level models - but they do support touchscreen AF, which eases focusing on the fly.

If you prioritize ergonomics and tactile control, the E-PL7 eeks out a slight win here, but it’s a marginal difference. Compactness and stylistic appeal keep both cameras highly portable and fun to handle.

The Heart of the Matter: Sensor and Image Quality

Under the hood, the E-PL7 and E-PL8 both use the same 16-megapixel Four Thirds CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm), paired with Olympus’s TruePic VII image processor.

This sensor size, smaller than APS-C or full-frame, does impose some limits, especially regarding noise performance and dynamic range. Yet Olympus made this sensor age gracefully, delivering excellent color reproduction and decent detail resolution, notably when paired with their high-quality Micro Four Thirds lenses.

From my lab testing and real-world shooting, image outputs from both cameras are nearly indistinguishable. You can confidently shoot JPEG or raw without worrying about visible quality degradation between the two models.

Dynamic Range and Color Depth:
Recent DxOMark testing gave the E-PL7 an overall score of 72, which is respectable but modest among modern standards. Its color depth and dynamic range - 22.7 bits and 12.4 EV respectively - lend to pleasing skin tones and vibrant landscapes, especially when shooting RAW and applying gentle processing adjustments.

Low-Light ISO Handling:
At base ISO 100 (note the E-PL8 defaults to ISO 200 minimum, with a boost mode to 100 for specialized use), both cameras perform well until around ISO 1600-3200, beyond which noise becomes more apparent compared to larger sensors. Still, the sensor’s antialias filter reportedly helps combat moiré artifacts, beneficial for high-detail textures like foliage or architectural lines.

A side-by-side comparison of raw files showed marginally cleaner shadows in the E-PL7’s images setting ISO 100 as native base, but I’d call this negligible in practical shooting.

In summary, neither camera sets new standards for Four Thirds sensor output. You won’t miss much upgrading between these two models, but if you’re seeking richer tonal gradation or high-ISO camps, looking beyond Four Thirds may be inevitable.

Touchscreen and Live View Experience

Both cameras feature a 3” tilting touchscreen with 1,037k-dot resolution, offering good clarity and brightness for framing or menu navigation. The E-PL7’s display tilts upward about 80 degrees, making selfie and vlogging shots easy, supporting its marketing as a ‘selfie-friendly’ camera.

Interestingly, the E-PL8 dropped the official “selfie friendly” marketing tag but retains the same tilting design - tipping up to nearly 180 degrees for front display usability. However, I’ve noticed the E-PL8’s screen has a slightly more robust hinge mechanism, feeling less delicate for frequent tilting.

Touch responsiveness is snappy on both models. Touch-to-focus (including AF area selection) and tap to shoot via the screen work seamlessly - great news if you prefer an intuitive, smartphone-style interface. While neither screen offers higher-end articulations or touchscreen menu controls you find on pricier Oly models, the basic functionality is consistent.

Autofocus Showdown: Precision and Speed

When it comes to everyday shooting, autofocus performance directly impacts your success rate, especially in dynamic scenarios like sports or wildlife. Both the E-PL7 and E-PL8 utilize contrast-detection AF with an 81-point focus area layout.

Do they differ in speed or accuracy? From my real-world tests - shooting indoors, outdoors, and with moving subjects - I observed minimal variation.

They offer:

• Single AF
• Continuous AF
• Face detection autofocus (no eye-detection or animal eye AF, unfortunately)

Continuous AF tracking is decent for casual action but doesn’t excel for fast-moving wildlife or sports. Both struggled somewhat with low-contrast or very dim scenes, an understandable limit given the contrast-based AF system.

Shooting burst rates: Both can shoot 8 fps continuous. That’s commendable in an entry-level mirrorless. However, autofocus doesn’t track focus across all frames when shooting continuously unless locked beforehand, limiting usefulness for high-speed subject tracking.

So, if sports or wildlife are your primary passions, there are better cameras. But for portraits, street photography, and landscapes, their AF systems are reliable and accurate enough.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither the Olympus E-PL7 nor E-PL8 offers weather sealing. Both have plastic composite bodies with metal accents, contributing to their lightweight feel but rendering them vulnerable to moisture and dust ingress.

If you’re a photographer who shoots a lot outdoors in the rain or dusty environments, I’d urge caution; neither camera can truly withstand the rigors of professional fieldwork without extra protective housing.

Both cameras include sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization (IBIS), which steps up handheld shooting stability substantially - something often reserved for higher-tier models.

Lenses and System Compatibility

One of Olympus’s greatest strengths is its rich Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem, with over 100 lenses available from Olympus, Panasonic, and third parties alike. Both the E-PL7 and E-PL8 are fully compatible with this lens lineup, making them highly versatile.

OLED or premium primes deliver great bokeh and sharpness - great for portraiture where background separation counts. The 2.1x crop factor means you can get substantial telephoto reach from compact lenses, beneficial for wildlife and sports beginners on a budget.

Battery Life and Storage

Interestingly, both cameras share the same battery model (BLS-50) with an estimated life of roughly 350 shots per charge based on CIPA standards. That’s fairly typical for entry-level mirrorless but could be limiting for full-day outings without spare batteries.

Storage-wise, both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and have a single card slot. Fast UHS-I cards will help quick buffer clearing during burst shooting but no dual slots for backup or overflow exists.

Connectivity and Video Capabilities

You’ll find built-in Wi-Fi on both models, allowing in-camera image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps. Bluetooth and NFC are absent, making the wireless connection slightly less seamless than modern competitors.

On the video front, both cameras shoot full HD 1080p (30 fps max) and 720p at 30fps. Video encoding options include H.264 and Motion JPEG. No 4K recording passes muster here.

Neither supports external microphones or headphone jacks, limiting audio control and monitoring for serious videographers.

While IBIS aids handheld video smoothness, rolling shutter artifacts and autofocus hunting occasionally crop up during recording, especially in low light or fast pans.

For casual travel clips or social media stories, these capabilities suffice, but serious videographers should look elsewhere.

How Do These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres?

A comprehensive camera review must touch on its suitability for common uses - here’s a breakdown in the context of Olympus E-PL7 and E-PL8.

Portrait Photography

Both deliver pleasing skin tones thanks to the sensor’s accurate color science and excellent lens options. The lack of eye-detection AF means careful manual focusing or confirmation post-shoot is necessary, but face detection helps. The in-body stabilization aids handheld shots at wider apertures.

Portrait bokeh is limited by the smaller sensor and lens selection but is respectable for casual portraits.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range is decent but not cutting-edge; expect some shadow noise at base ISO settings in challenging lighting. The resolution (16MP) delivers sufficient detail for moderate-size prints. Absence of weather sealing requires caution in hostile environments.

Both excel in portability for landscape hikers or urban explorers.

Wildlife Photography

Autofocus speed and subject tracking lag behind more advanced systems. Combined with the smaller sensor, this camera suits beginner wildlife enthusiasts but not pros. The Micro Four Thirds system’s telephoto lenses partially mitigate sensor size but burst autofocus tracking is lackluster.

Sports Photography

Similar to wildlife, continuous AF and burst shooting are adequate but not exceptional. At 8 fps, you can capture action but without the advanced focus tracking found in flagship models.

Street Photography

Light and compact, these cameras are excellent companions for street shooters - discreet and quick. The tilting screen on both helps shooting from non-standard angles. Low light limitations exist but the IBIS and decent high ISO handling help.

Macro Photography

No specialized macro features, focus bracketing, or stacking modes here, but focus accuracy and stabilization make it possible to get creative macro shots with suitable lenses.

Night and Astrophotography

Moderate high ISO noise reduction and IBIS enable handheld night shots. Neither offers dedicated long exposure or astro modes, so a sturdy tripod and manual control are mandatory.

Video-Centric Use

As noted, full HD with no advanced video codecs or external audio control limits professional filming. Adequate for casual usage but not for demanding shoots.

Travel Photography

This is where both cameras find a strong footing. Lightweight, versatile, and with IBIS, they make excellent travel companions for varied shooting conditions. Battery life requires strategy (carrying spares), but ease of use and lens flexibility shine.

Professional Use

Neither camera targets the professional sphere directly - no rugged weather-proof body, no advanced customizations, no dual card slots. They instead serve as excellent backups or second bodies for smaller kits.

Overall Performance Ratings & Value Assessment

After extensive hands-on testing, here is how these cameras measure up in an aggregated score, considering sensor, AF, build, and value.

The E-PL7 receives a slightly higher raw DxOMark sensor score and edges out the E-PL8 in handling, while the E-PL8’s improvements in stabilization and screen hinge quality get props. Pricing between them is comparable, hovering around $500 used or refurbished in 2024.

If you find an E-PL7 under $400 in good condition, it offers excellent bang for the buck. The E-PL8 nudges forward slightly with refinement but not enough to justify a big price premium.

Real-World Image Samples: Seeing is Believing

Here are samples from both cameras in varied lighting and contexts. Notice the consistent color profiles and sharpness. Subtle differences in contrast and noise are barely discernible.

Olympus E PL7 front Olympus E PL7 screen back Olympus E PL8 front Olympus E PL8 screen back

Honest Strengths and Weaknesses

Olympus E-PL7 Strengths:

• Slightly better base ISO noise performance
• More secure grip ergonomics
• More selfie-friendly tilting screen angle
• Good price point on the used market

Olympus E-PL7 Weaknesses:

• Older screen hinge mechanism feels less durable
• No updated IBIS or AF improvements

Olympus E-PL8 Strengths:

• Sensor-based 5-axis IBIS (claimed improved)
• More robust tilting screen hinge
• Updated AF algorithms (minor gain in speed)
• Same compact and lightweight form

Olympus E-PL8 Weaknesses:

• Minimum ISO starts at 200, less flexible for long exposures
• No selfie marketing despite similar screen tilt
• Slightly smoother grip but less secure hold

Who Should Consider Which Camera?

If you want a stylish, compact, entry-level mirrorless for casual or semi-serious photography and find a bargain-priced E-PL7, that’s a win. It suits travelers, street photographers, and families wanting sharp images with user-friendly touch interfaces.

If you want a slightly newer model with better in-body stabilization and don’t mind the ISO baseline shift, then the E-PL8 is worth the small extra cost. It’s excellent for vloggers (screen stability helps), casual portraits, and day trips where cinematic smoothness in video matters.

Neither camera is optimal for professionals relying on rugged design or blazing autofocus. Also, if video is your primary focus, look elsewhere for 4K and mic input.

Final Thoughts: Still Worth It in 2024?

This pair illustrates how small evolutionary steps can prolong a camera line’s relevance. The E-PL7 and E-PL8 remain viable options for enthusiasts who value portability, classic styling, and a vast lens ecosystem with solid image quality.

While both have limitations in autofocus sophistication, weather sealing, and video capabilities, their strengths in ease of use, color fidelity, and sensor stabilization deliver rewarding shooting experiences - particularly in portraits, landscapes, and travel contexts.

I recommend the E-PL7 for budget-conscious buyers who want a capable, compact camera with a friendly interface. The E-PL8 suits those seeking refined handling and in-body stabilization improvements without paying for flagship-level features.

Ultimately, your decision should align with your shooting style, lens goals, and price point. These cameras don’t reinvent the wheel, but they deliver steady, enjoyable performance that proves Olympus’s PEN series has staying power.

If you want a quick recap:

Here’s to finding a camera that captures your moments beautifully - whether it’s an Olympus PEN E-PL7, E-PL8, or another system!

Please feel free to reach out with your questions or share your experiences with these cameras - I’d love to hear how they fit your photographic journey.

camera-comparison #OlympusPEN #mirrorlesscameras #photographyreview