Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL7
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL8 was manufactured 6 years after the 6020 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-PL8 grades vs the 6020 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus 6020
E-PL8 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 81 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-PL8
6020 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus 6020
E-PL8 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL8 has got external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL8 versus the 6020.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c3a/f3c3aa65af4083aea6fc31b5017a34c46728e7d9" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and 6020 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12bae/12bae45cda3bab4f20449c84c72396e1a72a628d" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL8 and 6020.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent E-PL8 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae9b0/ae9b0e4e24af289162870f415acf9c4f6e6379a1" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b12bb/b12bb202a90dfbd0195f4ec4deaaf1c6161d6cbd" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $500 | $279 |