Clicky

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010

Portability
86
Imaging
55
Features
76
Overall
63
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL7
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-PL9
Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus 8010, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-PL8 was released 6 years after the 8010 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-PL8 matches up vs the 8010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus 8010

 E-PL8 8010 
IntroducedSeptember 2016February 2010Newer by 81 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-PL8

 8010 E-PL8 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus 8010

 E-PL8 8010 
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 has got exterior measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus 8010 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the 8010.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and 8010 is 86 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and 8010.

Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL8 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer E-PL8 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Portrait photography advice
Olympus 8010 Portrait photography advice
73
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
28
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Street photography advice
Olympus 8010 Street photography advice
84
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has focus via touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than competition (245g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 8010 as a Sports photography camera
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (13 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL8
Travel photography with Olympus 8010
72
has focus via touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
64
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (245 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus 8010 Landscape photography highlights
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
40
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (13 megapixels)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Vlogging factors
Olympus 8010 Vlogging factors
36
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic port
27
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competition (245g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus 8010
 Olympus PEN E-PL8Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL8 Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
Also referred to as - mju Tough 8010
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Announced 2016-09-19 2010-02-02
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 64
RAW images
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1/4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 357 grams (0.79 lbs) 245 grams (0.54 lbs)
Dimensions 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at release $500 $600