Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL8 was brought out 4 years after the TG-1 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL8 scores against the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | May 2012 | More modern by 54 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 610k | Clearer display (+427k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-1 iHS | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 provides physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL8 versus the TG-1 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and TG-1 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PL8 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 350 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $500 | $399 |