Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL7
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VG-160, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL8 was released 4 years after the VG-160 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-PL8 matches up versus the VG-160 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus VG-160
E-PL8 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 58 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-PL8
VG-160 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VG-160
E-PL8 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL8 has physical measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL8 vs the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24e8e/24e8e642ac3997ad408332d3667995ce3fbec0e9" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and VG-160 is 86 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d3e6/7d3e66b6315b9b980b6f6dd8286d889b5da0dc2c" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and VG-160.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/558de/558deb2721ae8a030877190774cb4b48e5ffa669" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75bc9/75bc959b4ba02238cddcc339c3d131d66a55abe6" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 165 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $500 | $90 |