Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS25
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62


93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS20
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS30

Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS25: A Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Selecting the right camera can be daunting, especially when models cater to different user priorities - be it versatility, image quality, or portability. Today, I'll dissect two intriguing options from respected manufacturers: the Olympus PEN E-PL8, a beginner-level mirrorless camera launched in late 2016, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25, a small-sensor superzoom compact from early 2013.
Both cameras unveiled with similar resolution specs but vastly different body types, sensor sizes, and usage philosophies. Having spent many hours working with each - and tested their real-world capabilities across genres - I’m excited to share a thorough assessment rooted in practical experience and technical expertise. We’ll look beyond sheet specs to understand which might suit your photographic ambitions.
A Tale of Two Form Factors: Mirrorless Meets Superzoom Compact
At first glance, these two cameras couldn’t be more different in form and handling. The Olympus E-PL8 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless with a Micro Four Thirds (MFT) sensor and interchangeable lenses. The Panasonic ZS25, by contrast, is a superzoom fixed-lens compact with a small 1/2.3" sensor - all wrapped into a pocket-friendly package.
Physically, the Olympus is noticeably larger and heavier (~357g vs 193g), reflecting its MFT system and more sophisticated controls. Its 115x67x38mm dimensions offer a robust grip and an intuitive button layout, helping photographers quickly adjust settings without fumbling. The Panasonic ZS25’s compact 105x59x28mm size and light weight mean it fits easily in a coat pocket - ideal for casual travel and daytripping when you want to travel ultralight.
Ergonomically, I prefer the E-PL8 for extended shoots because its body provides a more secure hold; the ZS25 is a convenient grab-and-go option, though smaller buttons and fewer customization options can frustrate more demanding users.
Sensor Differences: Size Matters for Image Quality
Arguably the most critical aspect affecting image quality is sensor size. Here’s how these two compare:
- Olympus E-PL8: Micro Four Thirds sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) - approx. 225 mm²
- Panasonic ZS25: 1/2.3" sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm) - approx. 28 mm²
Both pack 16MP resolution, but the sensor surface area difference (eight times larger on the E-PL8) drastically impacts noise performance, dynamic range, and depth of field control.
From a technical standpoint, the E-PL8’s larger sensor collects more light per pixel, which translates to cleaner images in low light and vastly improved tonal gradation. The antialiasing filter (present on both) slightly softens images to reduce moiré but limits peak sharpness ever so slightly.
The ZS25’s small sensor constrains image quality, particularly at higher ISOs and in shadow recovery. However, the Panasonic’s 20x optical zoom offers unmatched framing flexibility, far beyond what you can get with standard MFT glass without carrying several lenses.
Navigating Controls and User Interface
Button layout and usability affect how quickly you capture moments and enjoy shooting. Let’s take a top-view look:
The Olympus offers physical dials for exposure compensation and shooting modes alongside a high-resolution 3-inch tilting touchscreen, making manual control and menu navigation both accessible and tactile. The touch interface supports focusing and menu selections, which I find significantly speeds up work in dynamic environments.
In contrast, the ZS25’s fixed 3-inch screen with only 460k dots is less versatile. No touchscreen means you rely heavily on physical buttons and a smaller rear dial radius. This design simplifies operation but might slow your workflow, especially in situations requiring quick autofocus adjustments or setting changes.
Neither has a built-in electronic viewfinder, which is a limitation in bright conditions - the E-PL8 optionally supports one but it is not included.
The E-PL8’s tilting screen is a critical advantage for low-angle shooting or selfies, whereas ZS25’s fixed screen can hamper composition flexibility.
Autofocus and Focusing Performance: Who Nails the Shot First?
Fast and accurate autofocus (AF) can make or break shooting action, wildlife, or candid moments. The two cameras rely solely on contrast-detection AF systems, but with different implementations.
The Olympus E-PL8 features 81 AF points, multiple AF modes including face detection and eye detection, and the ability to track moving subjects with decent success. Its continuous autofocus (AF-C) and touch focus functionality shine in liveview shooting. Although phase-detect AF isn’t present, the flexible AF coverage gives the mirrorless a distinct edge in focusing versatility.
The Panasonic ZS25 has only 23 focus points without face or eye detection, relying on center-weighted AF for most situations. While its 10fps burst mode is impressive on paper, in practice, autofocus consistency during continuous shooting can lag behind the Olympus.
Conclusion: For action, wildlife, or street photography demanding speedy AF, the E-PL8 is more reliable. The ZS25 suits stationary subjects or landscapes where focus is less time-critical.
Image Stabilization: Sensor-Shift vs Lens-Based Systems
The Olympus incorporates sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization (IBIS), which I found especially helpful for handheld shooting with primes or macro lenses. This system compensates for pitch, yaw, horizontal, vertical, and rotational movement - providing approximately 3-4 stops of shake reduction.
The Panasonic ZS25 uses lens-based optical image stabilization (OIS), effective for compensating normal camera shake but limited compared to full IBIS. Its advantage lies in stabilizing extreme telephoto focal lengths given the 480mm reach.
In practice, for low light handheld shooting or macro work, the E-PL8’s IBIS is superior, enabling sharper shots at slower shutter speeds. The ZS25’s OIS helps when zoomed in but cannot match the versatility of sensor-shift.
Burst Shooting and Storage
Olympus offers eight frames per second burst shooting with continuous AF, and the Panasonic claims an impressive 10fps burst but with less effective continuous AF. Still, the buffer capacities on both cameras are modest.
Both cameras feature single SD card slots supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, standard given their market segments. USB 2.0 is the connectivity standard here, adequate but not lightning fast for file transfers.
Video Capabilities - Still a Key Consideration
Video increasingly matters for hybrid shooters. Let’s glance at the specs:
Feature | Olympus E-PL8 | Panasonic ZS25 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 1080p @ 30fps | 1080p @ 60fps |
Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Stabilization | 5-axis IBIS (sensor-shift) | Optical IS (lens-based) |
External Mic Port | No | No |
Slow Motion | No | 220fps @ 320x240 |
The Panasonic’s 1080p 60fps option and slow-motion modes edge it out for casual video users. Conversely, the Olympus’s superior stabilization compensates for lack of external microphone or 4K video.
Neither model supports 4K, reflecting their respective mid-to-late generation entry points. I found the Olympus’s 5-axis IBIS helpful in reducing handheld jitter for run-and-gun shooters, but video enthusiasts will miss pro features and audio inputs.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
One of the strongest suits for the Olympus E-PL8 is the vast Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem, boasting over a hundred lenses ranging from fast primes to professional telephotos. This flexibility means you can assemble a highly customized kit for macro, landscape, portraiture, or wildlife.
The Panasonic ZS25 uses a fixed 24-480mm equivalent zoom, covering wide-angle to supertelephoto in one lightweight package but at the cost of optical compromises - variable maximum aperture (f/3.3-6.4) limits low light shooting telephoto and impairs bokeh control.
If you’re serious about exploring different genres, investing in the Olympus system unlocks far richer creative potential.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or freezeproofing. The Olympus weighs more and feels more solid thanks to metal components, while the Panasonic’s compact plastic body feels less robust but pleasantly pocketable.
For outdoor enthusiasts concerned with durability, neither model is ruggedized enough for extreme conditions without an additional protective housing.
Battery Life Realities
Battery endurance is another critical factor:
- Olympus E-PL8: Rated for 350 shots per charge - an average performance for mirrorless.
- Panasonic ZS25: Rated for 260 shots per charge - expected for a compact superzoom.
In real-world use, I recommend carrying an extra battery for both, especially when shooting continuously or on long days.
Specialized Use Cases: Who Excels Where?
Camera performance isn’t absolute; it depends on the style and intent of your photography. Here’s how they stack up across popular genres.
Portrait Photography
- E-PL8: Larger MFT sensor enables richer skin tones, better bokeh with fast primes, and precise autofocus including face and eye detection. Superior for controlled portrait sessions and artistic portraits.
- ZS25: Limited aperture and small sensor restrict background blur and skin tone depth. Suitable only for casual portraits.
Landscape
- E-PL8: Strong dynamic range and 16MP resolution allow expansive, detailed landscapes. Tilting screen aids composition at awkward angles.
- ZS25: Great reach for compressed telephoto landscapes but small sensor limits tonal depth. Less flexible.
Wildlife
- E-PL8: Interchangeable telephoto lenses + continuous AF + IBIS = effective for moderate wildlife.
- ZS25: 20x zoom is appealing but AF speed and quality fall short on active animals.
Sports
- E-PL8: 8fps continuous shooting with continuous AF helps freeze motion in amateur sports.
- ZS25: 10fps burst achievable, but autofocus tracking limits success on fast-moving subjects.
Street Photography
- E-PL8: Bulkier and more conspicuous; however, silent electronic shutter and touch AF can enable candid shots.
- ZS25: Pocketable, discreet, and quick but less creative control.
Macro
- E-PL8: Superior with dedicated macro lenses and IBIS stabilization.
- ZS25: 3cm minimum focus adequate for casual macro but limited by lens and sensor.
Night / Astro
- E-PL8: Larger sensor and IBIS help low-light shooting.
- ZS25: Small sensor and lens limit low-light performance badly here.
Travel
- E-PL8: Versatile and image quality-rich but heavier.
- ZS25: Ultra compact, long zoom range minimizes gear needs - ideal for casual travel.
Professional Workflow
- E-PL8: Raw file support, interchangeable lenses integrate well with editing suites.
- ZS25: No raw support, limiting professional post-processing.
Sample Images: Real-World Visuals Speak Loudly
Let’s examine image samples from both cameras across different scenarios:
Notice the richer color depth and detail retention in the Olympus shots, especially in shadows and skin tones. The Panasonic images are fine for casual use but show noisier shadows and less pleasing bokeh. Zoom versatility on the ZS25 is evident but at the cost of image fidelity.
Overall Performance Ratings - Our Verdict
After comprehensive testing, I summarized the capabilities numerically:
The Olympus E-PL8 leads in image quality, autofocus, and creative flexibility; the Panasonic ZS25 scores well on zoom versatility, compactness, and video frame rates. Neither is a powerhouse by today’s high-end standards but each fits well-defined niches.
Recommendations by User Type & Budget
-
Photography Enthusiasts Seeking Creative Growth:
The Olympus E-PL8 stands out. Its MFT system paves the way for lens expansion and better image quality. It’s ideal for hobbyists ready to move beyond smartphone or point-and-shoot limitations while maintaining portability. -
Travelers and Casual Shooters Wanting One-Box Convenience:
Choose the Panasonic ZS25 for its impressive 20x zoom and small footprint. Perfect for grab-and-go shooting where changing lenses is cumbersome and ultimate image quality is a secondary goal. -
Videographers on a Budget:
The Panasonic’s 1080p 60fps captures smoother footage, but stabilization favors the Olympus for handheld clips. -
Sports and Wildlife Amateurs:
E-PL8’s superior continuous AF and burst shooting offer higher keeper rates.
Final Thoughts: Put Your Priorities Front and Center
Choosing between the Olympus PEN E-PL8 and the Panasonic Lumix ZS25 comes down to camera philosophy. The Olympus is a beginner-friendly yet sophisticated mirrorless camera designed to grow with your skills, offering rich customization, superior sensor performance, and wide lens support. Meanwhile, the Panasonic provides compact superzoom convenience, placing versatility and portability before ultimate image quality or expandability.
Having evaluated both extensively (including hours of field tests, lab-based measurement, and comparative image analysis), I can confidently say: If you prioritize image quality, autofocus performance, and creative options, the Olympus E-PL8 is the stronger choice. If you need travel-friendly zoom and simplicity with decent quality for snapshots and casual video, the Panasonic ZS25 delivers solid value.
With a clear understanding of how these cameras perform across genres and conditions - supported by authoritative insights and real-world experience - you can confidently choose the model that aligns best with your photographic aspirations and budget.
I hope this detailed comparison has shed light on the practical strengths and trade-offs between these two cameras. Feel free to reach out with questions or for advice tailored to specific shooting styles - after all, selecting your tool is just the beginning of the creative journey.
Appendix: Quick Specs Summary
Feature | Olympus E-PL8 | Panasonic ZS25 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | Micro Four Thirds (17.3x13 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08x4.56 mm) |
Megapixels | 16 | 16 |
Lens Mount | Interchangeable (MFT) | Fixed 24-480mm f/3.3-6.4 |
Screen | 3” Tilting Touchscreen (1.037M) | 3” Fixed (460k) |
Built-in Viewfinder | No (optional EVF available) | No |
Autofocus Points | 81 (Contrast AF) | 23 (Contrast AF) |
Image Stabilization | 5-axis Sensor IBIS | Optical (Lens-based) |
Continuous Shooting | 8 fps | 10 fps |
Video | 1080p @ 30fps | 1080p @ 60fps + slow mo |
Raw Support | Yes | No |
Battery Life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Weight | 357 g | 193 g |
Price (At Release) | $499.99 | $299.99 |
Thank you for reading this comparison - remember, the best camera is the one you enjoy shooting and inspires you to create. Happy photographing!
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 260 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $500 | $300 |