Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62


69 Imaging
50 Features
40 Overall
46
Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Sony A230, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and A230 (10MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and A230 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.

The E-PL8 was released 7 years later than the A230 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL8 matches up against the A230 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A230. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Sony A230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Sony A230
E-PL8 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 90 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus E-PL8
A230 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Sony A230
E-PL8 | A230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL8 features physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Sony A230 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL8 versus Sony A230 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-PL8 and the A230.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and A230 is 86 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and A230.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL8 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL8 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony A230 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-05-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 490g (1.08 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 230 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $500 | $569 |