Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
Portability
84
Imaging
52
Features
39
Overall
46

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Max Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros

Choosing between two entry-level mirrorless cameras can be daunting, especially when each offers distinctive design philosophies and features tailored to different styles of photography. Today, we bring you an in-depth, real-world comparison of the Olympus PEN E-PL9 and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12, two rangefinder-style mirrorless systems aimed at photographers stepping beyond point-and-shoot cameras.

Having rigorously tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, we’ll walk you through the technical highlights, usability quirks, and image quality nuances that matter most. By the end, you’ll know which camera aligns best with your creative vision and shooting habits.

Sizing Up the Contenders: Ergonomics & Design

When it comes to daily shooting comfort, size and handling are paramount - especially for street, travel, and event photography.

Feature Olympus E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Dimensions (mm) 117 x 68 x 39 120 x 70 x 45
Weight (g) 380 370
Body Style Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Build Material Polycarbonate + Metal Polycarbonate + Metal
Grip Design Minimal front grip Minimal front grip

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison

Both cameras embrace compact, travel-friendly footprints characteristic of modern mirrorless bodies. The Olympus E-PL9 is slightly slimmer and lighter by a marginal 10 grams, with a more tapered body profile that fits naturally in smaller hands. Its smooth surfaces and minimal front grip mean quicker pocket access but might challenge those with larger palms during extended shoots.

In contrast, the Ricoh GXR A12 is subtly chunkier but still pocketable. Its slightly thicker body can offer a firmer hold but sacrifices a bit of sleekness. This difference is especially noticeable if you prefer single-handed shooting or tend to shoot in dynamic street settings.

For a photographer prioritizing portability and ergonomic comfort for long-wear, Olympus's design edges ahead, particularly if paired with smaller Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Control Layout & User Interface: Intuitive Operation Matters

How a camera feels in your fingers can significantly affect your creative flow. Let’s compare their top design and control ergonomics.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison

  • Olympus E-PL9

    • Features a classic dial for mode selection, shutter button with integrated power toggle, and rear control dials.
    • Touchscreen interface complements physical buttons for faster AF point selection.
    • Lacks a top LCD panel but makes up for it with accessible, well-labelled controls.
    • User interface is clear and beginner-friendly with helpful exposure aids.
  • Ricoh GXR Mount A12

    • Has fewer controls on the body, relying more on menu navigation.
    • Lacks touchscreen functionality, limiting on-the-fly manual adjustments.
    • Shutter speed and aperture dials are more manual-centric but may slow down novices.
    • Overall interface feels dated and less fluid compared to newer systems.

Our hands-on use revealed the E-PL9’s touchscreen and intuitive dials make fast adjustments effortless, key for street and event shooters capturing fleeting moments. The GXR’s more minimal controls might appeal to photographers who prefer a simplified setup, but its lack of touchscreen limits responsiveness.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Core Imaging Engine

Arguably the most critical aspect to analyze is the sensor performance - because it governs your image quality across all genres.

Feature Olympus E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Sensor Type Four Thirds CMOS APS-C CMOS
Sensor Dimensions (mm) 17.3 x 13 (224.9 mm²) 23.6 x 15.7 (370.52 mm²)
Resolution (MP) 16 12
Native ISO Range 200 - 6400 200 - 3200
Max Boosted ISO 25600 Not specified
Anti-Aliasing Filter Yes Yes
Max Shutter Speed (Electronic) 1/16000s Not available

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison

The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sports a larger APS-C sensor, about 65% bigger in sensor area than Olympus’s Four Thirds sensor. Larger sensors typically deliver superior light gathering, translating into better low-light performance and dynamic range.

Despite Olympus offering a higher megapixel count (16MP vs 12MP), the sensor size and pixel pitch differences give the GXR a slight edge in image quality and noise control in practical shooting conditions. The limited native ISO of 3200 on the Ricoh contrasts with 6400 on the Olympus, though high ISO performance in real-world tests favors the Ricoh’s larger sensor.

The Olympus compensates with a more advanced TruePic VIII processor, enabling faster image rendering, better color fidelity, and improved noise reduction algorithms. Meanwhile, the Ricoh’s older design yet solid APS-C sensor still produces pleasing images with natural color rendition, especially outdoors.

Autofocus Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Action

Autofocus can make or break your shoot, especially for wildlife, sports, and fast-moving subjects.

Feature Olympus E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
AF System Contrast Detection, 121 points Contrast Detection
Continuous AF Yes Yes
Face Detection Yes No
Eye AF No No
AF Tracking Yes No

The Olympus E-PL9 utilizes a sophisticated 121-point contrast detection AF system, enhanced by face detection. This provides excellent subject tracking in live view and video modes. Its continuous AF performs well in moderate light and typical Mirrorless speed ranges, allowing bursts up to 8.6 fps - a significant advantage for capturing decisive moments.

The Ricoh GXR is limited to a 3 fps continuous shooting speed, with fewer AF points and no face or eye detection. Its contrast-based AF tends to hunt slightly in low light or fast action situations. Without tracking and smart detection, it’s better suited to composed still scenes rather than fast-paced photography.

For wildlife, sports, and event shooters demanding swift focus acquisition, the E-PL9’s AF system is clearly superior.

Display and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot

The usability of the rear LCD and availability of a viewfinder impact your shooting comfort significantly.

Feature Olympus E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Screen Size (inches) 3.0 3.0
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots 920k dots
Screen Type Tilting touchscreen Fixed, no touchscreen
Viewfinder Electronic optional Electronic optional

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The E-PL9’s 3-inch tilting touchscreen allows flexible angles, empowering compositions from waist level, above the head, or close to the ground - ideal for street and macro photography. Touch AF point selection enhances intuitive control, especially for beginners.

The Ricoh’s fixed LCD lacks touchscreen, and its resolution feels somewhat low by modern standards. While it has an optional electronic viewfinder, the lack of articulation makes creative framing trickier.

For photographers who use live view predominantly, want video versatility, or shoot from challenging perspectives, the Olympus offers a clear advantage here.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

A major strength of any mirrorless system lies in lens choices.

  • Olympus PEN E-PL9 uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, supporting 107 native lenses from Olympus, Panasonic, and third-party manufacturers like Sigma and Tamron. This extensive collection spans ultra-wide, standard primes, macros, and specialized telephotos.

  • Ricoh GXR Mount A12 features a fixed lens module design, meaning the sensor and lens come as a unit. The A12 unit uses an APS-C sensor with the ability to switch modules (though the system are uniquely structured), but the mount is not interchangeable in the conventional Micro Four Thirds or APS-C DSLR sense.

In practice, E-PL9 offers far greater flexibility for building a system optimized for portraits, landscapes, macro, or wildlife thanks to thousands of compatible lenses.

Battery Life and Storage Options: Ready to Shoot All Day?

Feature Olympus E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Battery Life 350 shots 330 shots
Storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage Slots 1 1

Both cameras feature single SD card slots supporting common memory cards, but Olympus has the advantage with support for faster UHS-I cards, improving buffer clearing and write speeds.

Battery life is comparable, around 330-350 shots per charge, sufficient for typical day outings but may require spares for extended sessions.

Connectivity Features for Modern Workflows

Feature Olympus E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Wi-Fi Built-in None
Bluetooth Yes No
NFC No No
USB Port USB 2.0 USB 2.0
HDMI Yes Yes

The Olympus E-PL9’s integrated Wi-Fi and Bluetooth allow easy image transfer to smartphones and remote camera control via apps - features increasingly essential for social media content creators and travel photographers.

The Ricoh GXR lacks wireless options altogether, limiting instant connectivity.

Video Capabilities: More Than Photography

Feature Olympus E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Max Resolution 4K UHD (3840x2160) 30p 720p (1280x720) 24p
Formats MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic/Headphone Ports None None
In-Body Stabilization Yes No

The Olympus E-PL9 supports 4K video, which is vital for vloggers and multimedia projects, although it lacks microphone inputs for advanced sound control. Its sensor-based image stabilization improves handheld video quality, minimizing shake.

Ricoh’s video specs are modest, capped at 720p and lacking modern codecs and stabilization. Video enthusiasts will find the E-PL9 far more versatile.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Disciplines

We put both cameras through their paces across key photographic genres to provide practical insights.

Portrait Photography

  • Olympus E-PL9

    • 16MP resolution and advanced face detection ensure pleasing skin tones and sharp eyes.
    • Micro Four Thirds lenses with wide apertures (like f/1.8 primes) generate attractive bokeh.
    • Touchscreen AF lets you precisely lock focus on the eyes, enhancing portrait impact.
  • Ricoh GXR A12

    • Larger sensor creates softer background separation despite lower 12MP.
    • Manual focus lenses may require patience, as no eye-detection AF exists.
    • Skin tones are natural but less vibrant due to older sensor design.

Recommendation: For consistent, user-friendly portraiture, Olympus leads thanks to autofocus sophistication and lens options.

Landscape Photography

  • Olympus sensor provides respectable resolution with solid dynamic range.

  • 4:3 aspect ratio native to Micro Four Thirds matches common printing sizes.

  • Weather sealing is absent but acceptable for casual outdoor work.

  • Ricoh’s APS-C sensor advantage manifests in better control over noise and shadows.

  • Fixed prime lenses often excel in sharpness and contrast.

  • Slightly bulkier form feels stable in hand for tripod use.

Recommendation: The Ricoh’s APS-C sensor delivers superior image quality when pixel-peeping landscapes with subtle shadow details, but Olympus offers more versatile framing with rotating screen.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • Olympus E-PL9 benefits from 8.6 fps burst mode and face tracking.

  • Smaller sensor impacts reach compared to APS-C or full frame but Micro Four Thirds lenses compensate with 2x crop factor.

  • Contrast-based AF hinders fast-moving subject tracking in dim light.

  • Ricoh’s 3 fps rate is sluggish for action shots.

  • AF tracking limited, making it less suitable for wildlife or sports.

  • Larger sensor helps with image quality but less flexible lens system limits telephoto options.

Recommendation: Olympus is preferable for entry-level wildlife and sports, especially with compatible telephoto primes. Ricoh isn’t optimized here.

Street and Travel Photography

  • Olympus is lightweight with a tilting touchscreen for inconspicuous shooting.

  • Built-in Wi-Fi assists quick sharing.

  • Pocketability and silent shutter provide discretion.

  • Ricoh is similarly compact but bulkier.

  • Lacks wireless and tilting screen hampers candid shooting angles.

Recommendation: Olympus’s compactness and modern interface favor street and travel photographers.

Macro Photography

  • Olympus has image stabilization and focus assist features aiding macro capture.

  • A wealth of native macro lenses provide real creative potential.

  • Ricoh has no stabilization or dedicated macro lenses.

  • Manual focus may challenge precision but can encourage deliberate composition.

Recommendation: Olympus takes the lead for macro enthusiasts looking for flexibility.

Night and Astro Photography

  • Olympus ISO ceiling at 25600 is useful but sensor size limits low-light performance.

  • Tilting screen facilitates composing at awkward angles.

  • Ricoh’s APS-C sensor delivers cleaner images at moderate ISO.

  • Lack of stabilization demands tripod.

Recommendation: Ricoh has an edge in astrophotography due to sensor size but Olympus’s functionality may help in overall night shooting.

Sample Images from Both Cameras: Visual Proof

Our side-by-side gallery demonstrates strengths and weaknesses in colors, sharpness, and noise performance.

Notice how Olympus produces punchier colors and better detail on medium contrast scenes, while Ricoh excels in shadow detail and natural tones on outdoor shots.

Overall Performance and Scores Summary

A synthesized view of all key performance vectors shows:

  • Olympus E-PL9 scores higher on autofocus, video, ergonomics, and connectivity.
  • Ricoh GXR scores well on sensor size advantages and image quality parameters, especially for stills.

Gear Matchups by Photography Type

Our genre-specific scoring highlights each camera’s strongest fit:

  • Olympus E-PL9 tops street, travel, portrait, and video.
  • Ricoh GXR Mount A12 favours landscape and night photography due to sensor benefits.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera is Right for You?

Choose the Olympus PEN E-PL9 if:

  • You want a modern, compact mirrorless perfect for versatile everyday use.
  • You prioritize fast autofocus, touchscreen control, and video capabilities.
  • You value access to the expansive Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem.
  • You shoot portraits, street photography, travel, and casual wildlife.
  • Wireless connectivity and social sharing features appeal to you.

Consider the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 if:

  • You prefer a larger APS-C sensor with excellent image quality in static scenes.
  • Manual focus and deliberate shooting style fit your workflow.
  • You mainly enjoy landscape, night, and studio photography.
  • You want an affordable, minimalist camera emphasizing image quality over convenience features.
  • You don’t need built-in wireless or advanced video.

Expert Recommendations for Accessories and Next Steps

  • For the E-PL9, check out native prime lenses like the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 or Olympus 45mm f/1.8 for portrait and street excellence.

  • Add a compact external flash or microphone to boost creative control.

  • Explore Olympus’s OI.Share app for remote shooting and quick sharing.

  • For the GXR A12, invest time in mastering manual focus and compose carefully.

  • Consider sturdy tripods for landscapes and night photography.

  • Look into Ricoh’s modular lens-sensor units for expansion, though these are niche.

Closing Advice

The Olympus PEN E-PL9 embodies a camera designed for effortless creativity with advanced features accessible to beginners and enthusiasts alike. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12, meanwhile, rewards a more contemplative, image-quality-first approach, optimal for dedicated still photographers.

Whichever you choose, both provide distinct pathways into mirrorless photography's joys. We encourage you to get hands-on, try them yourself, and match the camera’s strengths with your artistic ambitions. That way, you’ll capture not just images but moments that truly inspire your journey.

Happy shooting!

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Ricoh GXR Mount A12
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL9 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2018-02-08 2011-08-05
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 25600 -
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - ()
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/9000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 9.60 m
Flash options Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 380g (0.84 lb) 370g (0.82 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 330 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (5 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 $349