Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ad9f/9ad9fed4e1de451d71214c8e44f4b3a2f9aac050" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front"
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released June 2015
- Older Model is Sony RX10
- Updated by Sony RX10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus E-PL9 versus Sony RX10 II, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and RX10 II (1") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL9 was introduced 2 years later than the RX10 II and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL9 scores vs the RX10 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony RX10 II
E-PL9 | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | June 2015 | Fresher by 33 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus E-PL9
RX10 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper screen (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony RX10 II
E-PL9 | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 provides exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Sony RX10 II has dimensions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL9 versus Sony RX10 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 and the RX10 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18aff/18aff5ec7a755a2c3b90917c6bdde5fb09243ff6" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and RX10 II is 85 and 58 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c65/a1c657135273eef5be36b07a757e489bb691f3ae" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and RX10 II.
Clearly, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony RX10 II will offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/015b8/015b880cf69d9c815f7efa084516a74a91237688" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d02f0/d02f01c77751e1bc13946c3d428a51939d14a604" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lb) | 813 grams (1.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 400 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $599 | $998 |