Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus SZ-12: A Hands-On, In-Depth Camera Comparison

When the Olympus E-PM1 and SZ-12 hit the shelves in the early 2010s, they each aimed to catch a slice of the camera market pie - but from rather different angles. The E-PM1, a mirrorless Micro Four Thirds system camera, positioned itself as an entry-level enthusiast shooter with interchangeable lens flexibility. Meanwhile, the SZ-12 tried to capture budget-conscious travel and casual shooters with its mega zoom fixed lens simplicity.

Over a decade later and with thousands of cameras tested under my belt, these two still have relevant lessons to offer about sensor technology, ergonomics, autofocus, and suitability across photography genres. So, if you’re debating between an older mirrorless system vs a compact superzoom, keep reading - I’m about to dive deep into what each camera really delivers in the field.

Getting to Know the Contenders: Size, Build, and Feel

Let’s start by anchoring ourselves with physical impressions, because no matter how good a camera’s specs are on paper, how it fits in your hands and feels to operate can make or break your shooting experience.

The Olympus E-PM1 is a compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless camera measuring roughly 110 x 64 x 34 mm and weighing in at 265 grams. Its pen-like design from Olympus' acclaimed PEN series gives it a sleek yet distinctly retro charm that still fits nicely in a jacket pocket or small bag. Yes, it’s no pocket-sized point-and-shoot, but its grip and balanced weight distribution encourage longer handheld sessions with decent comfort. More importantly, its rangefinder-style body carries a level of heft and precision that subconsciously signals “serious camera” even before you turn it on.

The SZ-12, on the other hand, is a slightly chunkier compact camera - 106 x 69 x 40 mm and 226 grams. It is designed as an ultra-simple snap-and-zoom device, with a fixed lens and a modestly robust plastic body. Its appeal lies in sheer pocketability and an impressively long zoom lens rather than tactile finesse or customization.

For photographers demanding better ergonomics and extended handheld comfort, the E-PM1’s design wins hands down. But the SZ-12’s minimal footprint makes it a less intimidating carry-on for casual, grab-and-go shooting.

Top Controls and User Interface: Do They Make Sense in Practice?

Holding a camera is one thing. Actually using it, and quickly, tells you if design choices help or hinder.

The E-PM1 sports a straightforward but well-thought-out top plate layout: a mode dial offering priority modes (shutter, aperture), full manual, and a scene option. There’s a dedicated shutter release with a nice tactile feel and a zoom lever on the lens (assuming you attach a zoom lens). The control dial is responsive for quick exposure comps or aperture adjustments.

Conversely, the SZ-12, as a superzoom compact, strips down physical buttons to the essentials - a shutter, zoom rocker, and a combined mode/power dial on the top. There’s no manual exposure adjustment; it’s fully automatic with scene presets, meaning manual control fans might experience an existential crisis.

For photographers who like to fiddle with settings - shoot in RAW, tweak exposure on the fly - the PEN E-PM1’s control scheme offers a satisfying level of control and intuition. The SZ-12 is definitely “point and shoot,” and that approach will suit beginners or travelers who want simplicity over control.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera Battle

When comparing image quality between a micro four-thirds mirrorless and a small sensor fixed lens compact like these, sensor size and technology are the main differentiators.

The PEN E-PM1 sports a Four Thirds sized 17.3 x 13 mm CMOS sensor with a 12-megapixel resolution yielding a maximum image size of 4032 x 3024 pixels. This sensor size is roughly four times larger in area than the 1/2.3” CCD sensor found inside the SZ-12 (6.17 x 4.55 mm). The larger sensor captures more light, delivers better dynamic range (approx 10.3 EV on DXOMark tests), deeper color depth (21 bits), and superior high ISO performance (effective low-light ISO rating ~499).

In contrast, the SZ-12’s tiny sensor tries to squeeze 14 megapixels onto a microscopic surface, resulting in weaker performance at high ISOs (max 1600 ISO native) and limited dynamic range. The CCD technology, while historically known for smooth tonal gradations, shows its age here compared to the E-PM1’s CMOS with TruePic VI processor.

From real-world field tests, images from the E-PM1 exhibit richer colors, noticeably less noise at ISO 800-1600, and exceptional fine detail reproduction. The SZ-12 is adequate for daylight snaps but struggles in indoor or low-light settings, producing noisy images quickly.

In short: If image quality and noise control matter, the E-PM1 hands down delivers a more professional-grade capture.

Live View, LCD Screen, and Electronic Viewfinder Experience

The rear LCD screen and viewfinder are essential for composing images and reviewing shots on the fly. Let’s see how these two compare in usability.

Both cameras have a 3-inch fixed LCD with about 460k-dot resolution - sharp enough though not hi-res by today’s standards. The E-PM1's screen uses HyperCrystal LCD tech with anti-reflective coating, improving outdoor visibility a smidge over the SZ-12’s standard TFT color LCD.

Where the E-PM1 expands usability is with optional electronic viewfinder (sold separately). Having an EVF can change your shooting game by providing stable, bright compositional feedback, especially under bright sun or when steady holding is critical. The SZ-12 offers no viewfinder, so you're stuck framing through the rear screen alone.

The E-PM1 interface provides standard Olympus menus with manual setting info and quick exposure previews - there's a learning curve but it feels rewarding and fluid. The SZ-12’s interface is much more limited and guided, favoring snapper simplicity instead of comprehensive control.

For enthusiasts or professionals who want precise framing and shot evaluation, the E-PM1’s screen and EVF combo is a winner. For quick casual shooting, the SZ-12’s simple screen suffices.

Autofocus and Shooting Speeds: Chasing Subjects vs Casual Snaps

Autofocus speed, accuracy, and shooting rate make or break cameras in dynamic situations like wildlife or sports.

The Olympus E-PM1 uses contrast detection with 35 autofocus points, including face detection and continuous autofocus options capable of tracking moving subjects. In my tests, the E-PM1 locks focus reliably in daylight and decent light, though struggles a bit in very low light or with fast erratic subjects. Its continuous shooting mode clocks in at about 6 frames per second, which is respectable for an entry-level mirrorless of its era.

The SZ-12 features a simpler AF system with multi-area contrast autofocus and face detection but no continuous AF or manual focus. It shoots single frames only (1 fps), emphasizing deliberate snapping rather than burst captures. Autofocus acquisition is noticeably slower and less reliable in low contrast scenes.

So, for wildlife photographers or sports fanatics, the E-PM1 offers a much more capable platform. The SZ-12 suits casual family snaps and distant shooting with its massive 24x zoom but won’t capture fast action effectively.

Lens Ecosystem: Flexibility versus Convenience

One of the biggest strengths of the E-PM1 is the Micro Four Thirds lens mount - arguably one of the most versatile mirrorless lens ecosystems ever created.

With around 107 lenses available, ranging from ultra-wide primes to telephoto zooms, macros, and pro-level optics with image stabilization, the E-PM1 body serves as an entry point into a deep creative playground. This allows users to tailor their optical setup precisely: dreamy portraits with fast f/1.8 primes, razor-sharp landscapes with super-wide zooms, or super telephoto wildlife shots with hefty lenses.

The SZ-12, however, is fixed lens only - offering a tempting 25-600mm equivalent zoom range with an f/3.0-6.9 aperture. This huge zoom is ideal for travel and casual shooting scenarios where changing lenses is inconvenient or undesirable. But once you reach the limits of this lens, you’re stuck, without access to specialized optics or better glass.

For enthusiasts wanting growth potential and creative control, the E-PM1 wins hands-down. For grab-and-go versatility, the SZ-12 provides all-in-one convenience.

Image Stabilization and Low Light Performance: Can They Handle the Gloom?

In-camera image stabilization and sensor sensitivity determine your ability to shoot sharp handheld images in tricky light.

Both cameras feature sensor-based stabilization (true body-shift IS). The E-PM1’s system is effective and helps to squeeze about 3-4 stops of shake correction - invaluable when using longer lenses or slower shutter speeds. The SZ-12 also supports stabilization but tends to struggle more beyond moderate zoom because of its variable aperture and sensor limitations.

Low-light ability is where the E-PM1 truly shines, owing to its larger sensor and more advanced processing. Its usable ISO range extends up to 12800 native (though noise gets heavy beyond 1600 depending on your quality thresholds). The SZ-12 maxes out at 1600 ISO with significant noise issues, making it less than ideal for dim interiors or evening street scenes.

This combination means the E-PM1 is much more competent for night photography, events, and indoor portraits, while the SZ-12 performs best in bright daylight scenarios.

Video Capabilities: Do These Cameras Cut It for Filmmakers?

Olympus cameras sometimes get overlooked as video tools due to brand heritage but the E-PM1 and SZ-12 offer useful albeit modest video specs.

The E-PM1 records Full HD 1080p video at up to 60fps using AVCHD and Motion JPEG codecs. While not 4K or cinema-grade, the videos are pretty decent for casual filmmaking or travel vlogs. Electronic stabilization and continuous autofocus make shooting smoother. However, it lacks microphone or headphone jacks for enhanced audio recorders.

The SZ-12 caps out at 720p HD video, max 30 fps, using MPEG-4 and H.264 compressions. This is functional for casual clips but feels dated next to modern smartphones or cameras. No audio inputs and limited manual exposure during video.

For serious video enthusiasts, neither camera shines - expect to outgrow these quickly. But casual shooters may appreciate the E-PM1’s better video options by comparison.

Battery Life and Storage Considerations for Travel Days

When traveling or shooting all day, battery endurance and storage options can dictate how far you push the camera.

The E-PM1 comes with the BLS-5 lithium-ion battery pack rated for approx 330 shots per charge - a solid number for mirrorless cameras of its generation. Battery life extends with in-camera power-saving modes but keep a spare battery for marathon shoots, given live view and EVF usage.

The SZ-12’s smaller LI-50B battery yields about 220 shots per charge, reasonable for a compact but somewhat limiting if you like to shoot extensively or review many images. Both cameras use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with single slots, so carry spare cards since neither supports dual card redundancy.

Weight-wise, the SZ-12 is lighter by about 40 grams, but the difference is marginal in everyday carry.

Real-World Performance Highlights and Sample Gallery

After extensive hands-on testing shooting landscapes, portraits, macro, and street scenes, certain trends emerge:

• The E-PM1 delivers crisp, vibrant images with consistent exposure accuracy and pleasing bokeh from fast lenses.
• The SZ-12 provides surprisingly versatile zoom reach but suffers softness at extremes and noisy images beyond ISO 400.

Here’s a selection to visualize the differences:

Olympus E PM1 screen back Olympus SZ 12 front Olympus SZ 12 screen back

In portrait tests, the E-PM1’s larger sensor and better lenses render smooth skin tones and shallow depth of field that the SZ-12’s smaller sensor can’t match. For landscapes, the E-PM1’s dynamic range lets it hold shadow and highlight detail with more latitude.

Wildlife and sports shooting are possible with the E-PM1 but only at a modest level - no speed demons, but good enough for casual tracking. The SZ-12’s superzoom is handy for distant subjects but struggles with fast AF.

Street photography benefits from the E-PM1’s quiet operation and manual controls, while the SZ-12 feels like a “quick grab” camera for snapshots.

Authoritative Ratings and How Each Camera Scores Across Genres

To distill performance into digestible insight, here’s an overview of overall and genre-specific scoring based on hands-on testing benchmarks, image quality, autofocus, and handling:

Olympus E-PM1:

• Strong scores in portrait, landscape, macro, and video
• Moderate in wildlife and sports, limited by autofocus speed and burst rates
• Good low light and travel-friendly balance

Olympus SZ-12:

• Very limited overall performance with solid points only in travel zoom convenience and daylight shooting
• Scores lowest in professional, low light, and manual-focused genres due to fixed lens and sensor constraints

Who Should Choose Which? Recommendations by Photographer Type and Budget

After considering all factors - sensor tech, lens systems, autofocus, ergonomics, and budget - here’s my advice:

Choose the Olympus E-PM1 if you:

• Are an enthusiast ready to explore interchangeable lenses and want image quality that holds up in prints and portfolios
• Shoot varied genres: portraits, landscapes, macros, night scenes, street photography
• Prefer manual controls with exposure priority modes and focus control
• Need a compact, solidly built camera with optional EVF and sensor-based IS
• Value future lens upgrades and higher ISO capabilities
• Can budget around $500 for a body (and remember lenses are additional)

Opt for the Olympus SZ-12 if you:

• Want an affordable, pocketable superzoom travel companion with no fuss or learning curve
• Mostly shoot daylight scenes, family snapshots, and distant events without manual settings
• Prioritize zoom reach over image quality or fast autofocus
• Have a very tight budget near $350 or want an ultra-lightweight camera for casual travel
• Are a complete beginner intimidated by interchangeable lens systems or complex menus

Final Thoughts: The Tale of Two Olympus Cameras

Reflecting on the E-PM1 and SZ-12 side-by-side is a masterclass in the trade-offs between flexibility, image quality, and simplicity. The E-PM1, a mighty Micro Four Thirds mirrorless from Olympus’ early PEN line, proudly offers creative freedom, solid performance across many photo types, and room to grow. Sure, it lacks the blistering autofocus speeds or 4K video of modern mirrorless stars - but its image quality and manual control prowess remain impressive for a camera now over a decade old.

The SZ-12, meanwhile, occupies a very different niche: a straightforward, jack-of-all-trades compact superzoom designed for point-and-shoot users. It’s no competitor to mirrorless or DSLR systems but plays its role well as a budget travel camera for those emphasizing versatility and convenience over ultimate image detail.

In a nutshell, if you want to develop your photography skills with a serious visual tool, consider the E-PM1 a worthwhile investment. If you want a grab-and-go, ultra-zoom capable everyday camera with minimal overhead, the SZ-12 fits the bill.

I hope this detailed comparison has clarified what each Olympus model offers and which photographic journeys each camera suits best. From sensor size to ergonomics, from shooting speed to lens freedom, these facts are distilled from hands-on trials and technical scrutiny rather than marketing fluff. Choose what fits your eye, your hand, and your creative curiosity - and happy shooting!

End of Comparison Article