Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6

Portability
89
Imaging
52
Features
63
Overall
56
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-6 front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
54
Overall
45

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched May 2013
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
  • Released May 2019
  • Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview

In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-6, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and TG-6 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-PM2 was announced 7 years earlier than the TG-6 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-PM2 grades versus the TG-6 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-6

 E-PM2 TG-6 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-PM2

 TG-6 E-PM2 
ReleasedMay 2019May 2013Fresher by 73 months
Display resolution1040k460kClearer display (+580k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-6

 E-PM2 TG-6 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 has exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus TG-6 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 and the TG-6.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and TG-6 is 89 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and TG-6.

As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-PM2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-6 Portrait photography factors
71
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW files
40
focusing manually
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography features
Olympus TG-6 Street photography features
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than average (253 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PM2
Sports photography with Olympus TG-6
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
lacks phase detect auto focus
47
high fps (20.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery (340 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PM2
Travel photography with Olympus TG-6
66
boasts focus by touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
68
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
environment proofing
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than average (253g)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM2
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-6
74
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
57
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PM2
Vlogging with Olympus TG-6
36
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of mic port
34
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
missing microphone support
more heavy than average (253 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-6
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Olympus Tough TG-6
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PM2 Olympus Tough TG-6
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2013-05-21 2019-05-22
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 35 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per second 20.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 269 gr (0.59 pounds) 253 gr (0.56 pounds)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 shots 340 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support)
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $448 $449