Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd7f/ffd7f68f44b62cc6692afbe8663d94e19abfcd45" alt="Olympus Tough TG-6 front Olympus Tough TG-6 front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-6, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and TG-6 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PM2 was announced 7 years earlier than the TG-6 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-PM2 grades versus the TG-6 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus Tough TG-6. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-6
E-PM2 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-6 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2019 | ![]() | May 2013 | Fresher by 73 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-6
E-PM2 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 has exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus TG-6 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 and the TG-6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdcf0/bdcf0bf0829f3ff941408e3a38b0a611cc07627f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and TG-6 is 89 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb0b5/cb0b5dd2bd13a59d499cbe7d3ac462201984b964" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and TG-6.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-PM2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1043b/1043bee82d143ae1f01b740cb2f28fc20d07929b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d232d/d232dc5fc6207d592aceaa71f8e14c7219ae4071" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2019-05-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 253 gr (0.56 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 340 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $448 | $449 |