Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b169f/b169f2b717cb8d5ef4499816cf19dad2fd0b1dbd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FH25, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the FH25 (16MP) is very well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was released 2 years later than the FH25 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-PM2 grades against the FH25 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FH25
E-PM2 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 29 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-PM2
FH25 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FH25
E-PM2 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 has external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic FH25 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FH25 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the FH25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b25f9/b25f992e147d2754865132f9ca4d0eae866cb8b3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and FH25 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19907/199070afcdcbc757a83f69ed066925346dd3ead3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The graphic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and FH25.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same resolution but different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 uses the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The younger E-PM2 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1a99/f1a9972d2cc18e1879064a1030fe439e12f0153c" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/157b3/157b3f01039e4c24072d70be5c815ef3318233e3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 250 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $448 | $180 |