Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95

Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 front
Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed May 2013
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
Panasonic G95
(Full Review)
  • 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
  • Announced April 2019
  • Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-G90
  • Old Model is Panasonic G85
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic G95, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and G95 (20.3MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-PM2 was brought out 6 years earlier than the G95 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-PM2 matches up versus the G95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic G95

 E-PM2 G95 

Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus E-PM2

 G95 E-PM2 
AnnouncedApril 2019May 2013More modern by 71 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1240k460kSharper display (+780k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic G95

 E-PM2 G95 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 enjoys external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") and a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic G95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PM2 and the G95.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and G95 is 89 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and G95.

Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Panasonic G95 to give extra detail having its extra 4.3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic G95 Portrait photography advice
71
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
77
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20.3MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography info
Panasonic G95 Street photography info
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
supports focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
78
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
offers touch focus
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PM2
Sports photography with Panasonic G95
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect autofocus
68
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20.3 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
bad battery (290 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic G95 Travel photography highlights
66
supports focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
73
weather sealing
has bluetooth
offers touch focus
megapixel count good (20.3 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
bad battery (290 CIPA)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic G95 as a Landscape photography camera
74
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
76
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20.3MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
bad battery (290 shots)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging factors
Panasonic G95 Vlogging factors
36
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone port
79
selfie friendly display
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic G95
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus PEN E-PM2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95
Also Known as - Lumix DMC-G90
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2013-05-21 2019-04-05
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20.3MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 200
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 35 49
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 107 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460k dot 1,240k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames/s 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 6.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 269g (0.59 lb) 536g (1.18 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 shots 290 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported)
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $448 $998