Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Introduced February 2018
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic GX9, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and GX9 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GX9 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-820 iHS was brought out 7 years earlier than the GX9 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-820 iHS scores vs the GX9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic GX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic GX9
TG-820 iHS | GX9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GX9 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | February 2012 | Newer by 73 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 1030k | Clearer screen (+210k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic GX9
TG-820 iHS | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Panasonic GX9 has proportions of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") with a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic GX9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the GX9.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and GX9 is 92 and 82 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and GX9.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Panasonic GX9 will provide greater detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic GX9 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 407 grams (0.90 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 260 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $500 | $1,000 |