Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus PEN-F versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe PEN-F was manufactured 2 years later than the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the PEN-F matches up against the TG-850 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN-F and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
PEN-F | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | January 2014 | More recent by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus PEN-F
TG-850 iHS | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-850 iHS
PEN-F | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing |
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus PEN-F offers physical measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") having a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Olympus PEN-F versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the PEN-F compared to the TG-850 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the PEN-F and TG-850 iHS is 84 and 91 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the PEN-F and TG-850 iHS.
As you can see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The PEN-F because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will render more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent PEN-F is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4616 x 3464 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427g (0.94 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,000 | $250 |