Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f4a/39f4a2ac2cd0fd15df5e1339b544117913bf8f2e" alt="Olympus PEN-F front Olympus PEN-F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus PEN-F versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The PEN-F was unveiled 3 years after the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the PEN-F scores versus the TG-830 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
PEN-F | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 38 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus PEN-F
TG-830 iHS | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-830 iHS
PEN-F | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus PEN-F offers physical measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus PEN-F versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the PEN-F vs the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33299/33299c7c68d13f49e5f593280a8490dac9c13ef9" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and TG-830 iHS is 84 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f3c6/5f3c60efe77820cecd051caf3eacc2a5fbbcd353" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the PEN-F and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The PEN-F having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus PEN-F will provide you with more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher PEN-F provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bdbe/1bdbe976d821bb4b761a924a6f0aadbf855e7bf2" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21d2/d21d229c066d912ddd3db8282ded540b274d1b10" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427 gr (0.94 lb) | 214 gr (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,000 | $0 |