Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Panasonic ZS200, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-565UZ was unveiled 10 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic ZS200
SP-565UZ | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
ZS200 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2009 | More recent by 110 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic ZS200
SP-565UZ | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ has got external dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ and the ZS200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and ZS200 is 72 and 86 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and ZS200.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SP-565UZ with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer greater detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Other name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-01-15 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $400 | $800 |