Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FX75, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and FX75 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-565UZ was released 16 months earlier than the FX75 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Panasonic FX75
| SP-565UZ | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| FX75 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 16 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FX75
| SP-565UZ | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ and Panasonic FX75 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the FX75.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and FX75 is 72 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The photograph here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and FX75.
Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Panasonic FX75 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $400 | $139 |