Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32


97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Introduced September 2011

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The SP-565UZ was introduced 3 years before the MV800 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SP-565UZ grades against the MV800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung MV800. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung MV800
SP-565UZ | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
MV800 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung MV800
SP-565UZ | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys exterior dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the MV800.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and MV800 is 72 and 97 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and MV800.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung MV800 to show extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung MV800 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | Micro SD |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $400 | $499 |