Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10
- Renewed by Sony RX10 III
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony RX10 II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and RX10 II (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and RX10 II (1") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was launched 4 years earlier than the RX10 II and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VR-320 scores vs the RX10 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony RX10 II
VR-320 | RX10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus VR-320
RX10 II | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | July 2011 | More recent by 47 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony RX10 II
VR-320 | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 II has measurements of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony RX10 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 against the RX10 II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and RX10 II is 94 and 58 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and RX10 II.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX10 II will show more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 813g (1.79 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $179 | $998 |