Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Launched January 2009
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
  • Also Known as ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The SP-565UZ was launched very close to the SL102 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung SL102

 SP-565UZ SL102 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 SL102 SP-565UZ 

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung SL102

 SP-565UZ SL102 
IntroducedJanuary 2009January 2009Similar generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.5"2.5"Same screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

See the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the SL102.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and SL102 is 72 and 96 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and SL102.

As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you should expect similar quality of images though you would want to consider the production date of the products into consideration.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
39
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
25
supports face detection autofocus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography info
Samsung SL102 Street photography info
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
55
lighter than competitors in class (116 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
33
excellent zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography advice
Samsung SL102 Travel photography advice
52
flash built-in
fairly wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
62
lighter than competitors in class (116g)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography information
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography information
40
you can focus manually
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5")
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse mode
27
good max aperture (f)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL102 as a Vlogging camera
24
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
30
good max aperture (f)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (116 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung SL102
 Olympus SP-565UZSamsung SL102
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Samsung SL102
Alternate name - ES55
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-15 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-4.5 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413 gr (0.91 pounds) 116 gr (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD Picture Card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $400 $130