Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Released September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony QX1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SP-565UZ was launched 6 years before the QX1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SP-565UZ grades against the QX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sony QX1

 SP-565UZ QX1 
Screen size2.5""Bigger screen (+2.5")
Screen resolution230k0kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 QX1 SP-565UZ 
ReleasedSeptember 2014January 2009Newer by 68 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony QX1

 SP-565UZ QX1 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony QX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the QX1.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and QX1 is 72 and 90 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and QX1.

As you can tell, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony QX1 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography highlights
Sony QX1 Portrait photography highlights
39
manual focus
supports RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
66
you can focus manually
good resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW files
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography information
Sony QX1 Street photography information
56
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
69
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
provides touch to focus
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
more heavy than others (216g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Sports photography with Sony QX1
33
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
56
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good battery pack (440 shots)
max fps very slow (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography info
Sony QX1 Travel photography info
52
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
long zoom (520mm)
no Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
good battery pack (440 CIPA)
provides touch to focus
good resolution (20MP)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (216g)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography advice
Sony QX1 Landscape photography advice
40
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse function
64
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
good battery pack (440 shots)
small screen (")
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging details
Sony QX1 Vlogging details
24
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic support
32
touchscreen functionality
offers face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
does not have microphone port
more heavy than others (216g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony QX1
 Olympus SP-565UZSony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus SP-565UZ Sony Alpha QX1
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Lens-style
Introduced 2009-01-15 2014-09-03
Body design Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 6400 16000
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 143 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-4.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.6
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" -
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 1s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.40 m (ISO 200) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 413 gr (0.91 pounds) 216 gr (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light score 68 not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, Internal microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $400 $500